w00t!

1337.jpg

0ld m4/\/z w4|2 is teh r0><><0r, d00dz!!!! I 4m 1337!!

Oh, don’t mind me. I’m just trying to hang with the kids and, you know, speak teh language.

(For those of you completely out in the dark, the number “1337″ — which is the Amazon ranking in the picture above — is an analogue for “leet,” which is short for “elite,” in “leetspeek,” a kind of replacement code that gamers and others use for actual letters. It stopped being cool, oh, roughly the same time I started writing this entry. The first line of this entry, then, reads: “Old Man’s War is the rock! I am leet!”

Please bear in mind that I am, in fact, not making any real representation of Old Man’s War being the rock, or of me being, in fact, leet. The sentence in question is merely to be appreciate for the ironic value of a 35-year old man using the slang of 15 year olds. Please, go about your life.)

Comments

  1. Kevin Q says:

    I’ve never understood the attractiveness of “1337-speak.” It seems to take so much more effort than just typing. I think it’s the computer nerd equivalent wearing your jeans below your boxers. It’s saying “I’m so cool, I can spend all this time /.”

    The only one I understand is “teh,” since, for some reason, I accidentally type that one all teh time.

    Ah, youth culture – a way to look ignorant in numbers.

    K

  2. Kevin Q says:

    Hmmm, that’s interesting. If you put anything in angled-brackets, the browser considers it HTML, and it gets lost.

    The last sentence of the first paragraph was to read:
    “I’m so cool, I can spend all this time (hoisting my pants up) / (typing things that are hard to read).

    K

  3. Tripp says:

    I think “teh” should be t3h, but what do I know. I like “pron” as well.

    Leet is not much different than any other jargon. It is a way to identify group aliance.

    |20[|

  4. Mer Haskell says:

    The classic “Does anyone here speek L33t?” cartoon on Megatokyo (http://www.megatokyo.com/index.php?strip_id=9)was written by someone who is at least your age, John.

    Also, the teh/t3h divide (much like the L33t/1337 issue) is just the difference between regular and advanced 133t (I prefer a mid-grade version)–as evidenced by this l33t generator, which offers to translate into both:
    http://www.skoolshooting.com/text_howto_elite_translate.htm

  5. Mer Haskell says:

    The classic “Does anyone here speek L33t?” cartoon on Megatokyo (http://www.megatokyo.com/index.php?strip_id=9)was written by someone who is at least your age, John.

    Also, the teh/t3h divide (much like the L33t/1337 issue) is just the difference between regular and advanced 133t (I prefer a mid-grade version)–as evidenced by this l33t generator, which offers to translate into both:
    http://www.skoolshooting.com/text_howto_elite_translate.htm

  6. Ben says:

    Kevin Q: When I read your original post, I thought you were referring to slashdot, the website and thinking, “I’m so cool, I can spend all this time (reading) slashdot”

    pwned

    Had to get that out

  7. Bowler says:

    According to the rules of Parody, 1337speak is offically dead:

    http://www.microsoft.com/athome/security/children/kidtalk.mspx

  8. Mary says:

    And when it was alive, it was written “pr0n” rather than “pron”. Of course, once middle aged Canadian women know that, it’s a given that leet is SO over.

  9. Mary says:

    And when it was alive, it was written “pr0n” rather than “pron”. Of course, once middle aged Canadian women know that, it’s a given that leet is SO over.

  10. Ken says:

    The funny thing is that leetspeek has now become so self-referential and self-mocking — you are as likely to see “OMG WTF!11!eleven!!” as “OMG WTF !11!!!111!!”

  11. Brian says:

    Assorted HTML codes for symbols (apologies to those who already know this):

    > — &gt;
    < — &lt;
    & — &amp;

    Type the whole thing, ampersand through semicolon. You can do lots of other stuff, too…

    é — &eacute;
    ò — &ograve;

    etc.

  12. Andrew Wade says:

    > The funny thing is that leetspeek has now become so self-referential and self-mocking
    It had to evolve, the age of BBSes is over.
    I have it on good authority[1] that the constructions that leetspeek is mocking started as a way to get around censorship on bulletin-board systems. If the word “hacker” was censored, everyone would simply talk about “haxors” or “h4x0rs” or something.
    [1] I read it on the internet somewhere.

  13. Andrew Wade says:

    > The funny thing is that leetspeek has now become so self-referential and self-mocking
    It had to evolve, the age of BBSes is over.
    I have it on good authority[1] that the constructions that leetspeek is mocking started as a way to get around censorship on bulletin-board systems. If the word “hacker” was censored, everyone would simply talk about “haxors” or “h4x0rs” or something.
    [1] I read it on the internet somewhere.

  14. PiscusFiche says:

    I actually talk in leet speak–that’s how much an inside joke it became with me and my friends. I once said, “Roxor my soxors!” at work, and got several raised eyebrows. My brother and I say “teh” instead of “the”. And “heart” as in “I heart poutine” or “I heart the interweb”. I haven’t quite progressed to saying “less-than-3″ but give it time. (For those of you blinking right now, less-than-three is

  15. PiscusFiche says:

    Grrr. Part of my post seems to have disappeared–right where I was explaining less-than-three. (But I bet most of you can figure it out easily enough, if you aren’t already acquainted with it.)

  16. PiscusFiche says:

    Grrr. Part of my post seems to have disappeared–right where I was explaining less-than-three. (But I bet most of you can figure it out easily enough, if you aren’t already acquainted with it.)

  17. Squid says:

    For those of you blinking right now, less-than-three is

    My friends and I insist on calling that glyph a buttcone.

  18. Squid says:

    Funny, my buttcone got eaten too … oh, because I previewed the post, and the < entity turned into an actual < when I wasn’t looking.

  19. PiscusFiche says:

    Guess I should have typed it out the long way: <3

  20. gary gibson says:

    not sure if you’ve seen this, but there’s a couple of articles floating around out there which make guesses about how amazon ranking works (amazon themselves aren’t telling). it’s interesting if you’re as ridiculously obsessive about amazon ranking as i am. er, sometimes.

    http://www.greententacles.com/articles/2/18

    and

    http://www.fonerbooks.com/surfing.htm

  21. gary gibson says:

    not sure if you’ve seen this, but there’s a couple of articles floating around out there which make guesses about how amazon ranking works (amazon themselves aren’t telling). it’s interesting if you’re as ridiculously obsessive about amazon ranking as i am. er, sometimes.

    http://www.greententacles.com/articles/2/18

    and

    http://www.fonerbooks.com/surfing.htm

  22. John Scalzi says:

    Thanks, Gary.

    I am curious about the methodology of the rankings, although I’m not so obsessed by the rankings that I believe they have some sort of direct relation to reality (outside, of course, Amazon itself). As an example, the first “Book of the Dumb” never got higher than the Amazon ranking of about 2,000 (right around Christmastime), but it’s sold somewhere in the area of 50,000 copies, many (if not most) of those through places like Sam’s Club. The vast majority of its sales simply don’t go through the online world.

    “Old Man’s War” has consistently outranked “Book of the Dumb” — and “BotD 2″ — in the Amazon rankings, but if it sold even half as well as Book of the Dumb (in hardcover, at least), I think we all — Me, Patrick and possibly Tom Doherty — would fall out giggling from our seats.

    Lesson: Amazon rankings are NOT consistent with overall reality. Take them too seriously at your own risk. I mean, it’s fun and all to watch them move. But I know enough not to actually think that a low Amazon ranking automatically means bad sales in the outside world, or vice-versa.

  23. nelson says:

    Half of the popularity of leet in World of Warcraft is the whole inter-faction “talking over the yell channel” thing. This requires strict leet-speak (as in, NO letters) to avoid the scrambling that happens to text.

    I swear that some days I could plug my Ironforge spam into a perl script and it would run.

  24. chris says:

    if anyone has a good leet translating html(or java) please E-mail it to me. thanks. 7/-/47 \/\/0/_/1/> 120x012z! 7/-/4/\//

  25. chris says:

    if anyone has a good leet translating html(or java) please E-mail it to me. thanks. 7/-/47 \/\/0/_/1/> 120x012z! 7/-/4/\//

This is the place where you leave the things you think

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s