Obituaries for Himself

Comments

1. tor kristensen says:
   November 10, 2007 at 8:50 am

   First Vonnegut, and now Mailer.
   Is there a living writer or thinker that could fill either of those voids?
   Western culture just got that much poorer.
   I hope Umberto Eco is taking his vitamins.
2. Patrick M. says:
   November 10, 2007 at 10:40 am

   I don’t believe CNN is an acceptable source.
3. D. says:
   November 10, 2007 at 10:54 am

   Patrick M.: Try http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/10/books/11mailer.html?hp .
4. Patrick M. says:
   November 10, 2007 at 1:47 pm

   Well, I guess we can take it under consideration, but we have been given death notifications from Whatever before only later to find out that they were the truth.
5. Lars says:
   November 10, 2007 at 1:58 pm

   Not knowing much about him as a writer, it’s strange seeing his dirty laundry dragged out in obituaries like this one. I have a feeling that I’m walking away with a skewed image of who he was.

   Two facts that jumped off the page at me were the fact that he “stabbed his second wife, almost fatally,” and “crusaded against the women’s liberation movement.” It’s difficult to relate to the deceased after two bombs like that have been dropped.
6. Scorpio says:
   November 10, 2007 at 2:09 pm

   He used women like kleenex, and stabbed at least one of his wives. I worked with a female cousin of his, and she notably said “Cousin Norm is a pig”. I’ve never had reason to question her judgment in this.

   He didn’t write all that well, either.
7. Johnny carruthers says:
   November 10, 2007 at 3:48 pm

   I can’t recall having ever read any of his writing, so my reaction is more “Oh” than anything else.From what I read in that obituary, it doesn’t sound as though he was that admirable a person.
8. Mark Terry says:
   November 10, 2007 at 3:50 pm

   Muscular lyrical prose, arrogance that pretty much defines “hubris”, a daunting talent, and to all outside appearances, a miserable, fucking human being.

   All told, although I wouldn’t mind seeing “a daunting talent” on my tombstones, I don’t want “a miserable, fucking human being” on it.
9. Nathan says:
   November 10, 2007 at 4:35 pm

   Maybe it says more about me than it does about Norman Mailer, but I’ve tried to read “The Naked and the Dead” 3 or 4 times.

   Can. Not. Get. Through. The. Thing.

   D’oh!
10. Patrick M. says:
    November 10, 2007 at 8:09 pm

    Which brings me to the question, what do you suppose he’ll be wearing at his funeral?
11. Angelle says:
    November 10, 2007 at 9:04 pm

    What Mark said.
12. Ex-Fed says:
    November 10, 2007 at 11:27 pm

    Occasionally brilliant, often offensive, occasionally hilarious (though not intentionally).
13. Aaron says:
    November 11, 2007 at 12:24 am

    I inherited a button from my grandmother, a remnant of Mailer’s ill-fated run for Mayor of New York City. It says “Vote the Rascals In”. It never ceases to make me giggle.
14. tor kristensen says:
    November 11, 2007 at 8:56 am

    Give me a writer dripping hubris, talent, sweat, dissatisfaction!

    Give me a writer that would rather take your brain by force, than by the mincing posturing of so much of the current “literature”.

    No, they rarely play nice and hardly ever respect our carefully balanced truce with modern correctness. I would rather be forced to deal with a great talent and personality I cannot agree with, than a carefully edited provider of theme-parks for the mind.

    Hunter S. Thompson – (July 18, 1937 – February 20, 2005)
    Kurt Vonnegut – (November 11, 1922 – April 11, 2007)
    Norman Mailer – (January 31, 1923 – November 10, 2007)

    Where are the writers with talent and ego enough to step into the void these three have left?

    Or are we all simply waiting for the next stale Ludlum adrenalin drip, or the next Million Little Pieces of Plagiarism to come out?

    So it goes, in fuggin Bat Country.
15. Jim Winter says:
    November 11, 2007 at 10:17 am

    I understand his biggest fan died yesterday, too.
16. Bruce A. says:
    November 12, 2007 at 2:45 pm

    He was an asshole. But a damned interesting one.
17. John E. says:
    November 12, 2007 at 5:06 pm

    He had some interesting thoughts on theology toward the end, and now he knows if he was right.

This is the place where you leave the things you think Cancel reply

Enter your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (required) (Address never made public)

Name (required)

Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

Notify me of new posts via email.