<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your Big Fat Election Brain Dump, 1/11/08</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/01/11/your-big-fat-election-brain-dump-11108/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/01/11/your-big-fat-election-brain-dump-11108/</link>
	<description>I FORGET WHAT EIGHT WAS FOR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:11:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steffan T</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/01/11/your-big-fat-election-brain-dump-11108/#comment-10201</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steffan T]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 07:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=291#comment-10201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Someone way up this chain asked how someone can look at themselves in the mirror &amp; call themselves a Republican.  Allow me:

Don&#039;t vote for crazy people just because they are in your party.

I haven&#039;t voted for a member of my own party in the presidential election since Bob Dole, and even he was not someone I was warm &amp; fuzzy about.

But I am not going to stop calling myself a republican, since the ideals the R party claims are mostly my ideals, even if they stopped actually following them years ago.  Example:

Tax the minimum amount necessary to support the services that you must have.

I think that went out the window after Bush Sr got defeated by Reagan in 80, although they occassionally woke up from the kool-aid up until Bush Sr got killed in the 92 primaries for breaking his &quot;no new taxes&quot; pledge.  (unfairly so, I might add.)

And I will point out that the Reagan tax cuts were based on sound economic theory. (not trickle-down, but the Laffer curve)  The problem is that every R since then has decided that since one tax cut caused a massive economic boom, every later one will too.  Never mind that the theory indicates that any tax cut once tax revenues are at the Laffer maximum will cause loss in revenue that will not be covered by future growth.

personal opinion:  the Clinton tax increases left us near the Laffer maximum.

The other thing I&#039;d like to see is people stop yelling about government waste.  Yes, on an absolute scale, we waste huge sums of money.  But take a look at the percentage, and ask yourself how many auditors would we need to hire to police the budget.  If the cost of providing good audit services is more than the expected waste uncovered by doing so, then it isnt a good plan to hire those auditors.

Actually, let me rephrase that:
I wish people would stop yelling about government waste and then cutting the audit departments/mine inspectors/what have you.  Saving money this year by eliminating the audit department will save money, but eventually someone will notice that they can steal whatever they want. No one notices that Idaho has been transported into someone swiss bank account until someone tries to land a plane in Boise &amp; wonders where the ground went.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone way up this chain asked how someone can look at themselves in the mirror &amp; call themselves a Republican.  Allow me:</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t vote for crazy people just because they are in your party.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t voted for a member of my own party in the presidential election since Bob Dole, and even he was not someone I was warm &amp; fuzzy about.</p>
<p>But I am not going to stop calling myself a republican, since the ideals the R party claims are mostly my ideals, even if they stopped actually following them years ago.  Example:</p>
<p>Tax the minimum amount necessary to support the services that you must have.</p>
<p>I think that went out the window after Bush Sr got defeated by Reagan in 80, although they occassionally woke up from the kool-aid up until Bush Sr got killed in the 92 primaries for breaking his &#8220;no new taxes&#8221; pledge.  (unfairly so, I might add.)</p>
<p>And I will point out that the Reagan tax cuts were based on sound economic theory. (not trickle-down, but the Laffer curve)  The problem is that every R since then has decided that since one tax cut caused a massive economic boom, every later one will too.  Never mind that the theory indicates that any tax cut once tax revenues are at the Laffer maximum will cause loss in revenue that will not be covered by future growth.</p>
<p>personal opinion:  the Clinton tax increases left us near the Laffer maximum.</p>
<p>The other thing I&#8217;d like to see is people stop yelling about government waste.  Yes, on an absolute scale, we waste huge sums of money.  But take a look at the percentage, and ask yourself how many auditors would we need to hire to police the budget.  If the cost of providing good audit services is more than the expected waste uncovered by doing so, then it isnt a good plan to hire those auditors.</p>
<p>Actually, let me rephrase that:<br />
I wish people would stop yelling about government waste and then cutting the audit departments/mine inspectors/what have you.  Saving money this year by eliminating the audit department will save money, but eventually someone will notice that they can steal whatever they want. No one notices that Idaho has been transported into someone swiss bank account until someone tries to land a plane in Boise &amp; wonders where the ground went.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon H</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/01/11/your-big-fat-election-brain-dump-11108/#comment-10200</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon H]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=291#comment-10200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John wrote: &quot;Who does she look like when she wears a pantsuit?&quot;

I don&#039;t know but I bet she looks &lt;i&gt;smashing&lt;/i&gt;.

But I&#039;m not sure she wears pantsuits. I think it&#039;s in the Bible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John wrote: &#8220;Who does she look like when she wears a pantsuit?&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know but I bet she looks <i>smashing</i>.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m not sure she wears pantsuits. I think it&#8217;s in the Bible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Marcus</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/01/11/your-big-fat-election-brain-dump-11108/#comment-10199</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Marcus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=291#comment-10199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Err...never mind. I confused Jim &amp; Jack Ryan...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Err&#8230;never mind. I confused Jim &amp; Jack Ryan&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Marcus</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/01/11/your-big-fat-election-brain-dump-11108/#comment-10198</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Marcus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=291#comment-10198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drew @ 99

I lived in Chicago then...and back when the Trib editorial page said this about Jim Ryan (back when he f-cked up a death penalty case):

 &quot;Those who did wrong or were derelict also must be held to account. At the top of this list must be Illinois Atty. Gen. Jim Ryan...none of those involved in the Cruz prosecution deserves ever again to enjoy a position of public honor or trust. They have demonstrated that they have no honor and they merit no trust.&quot;

I&#039;d say it&#039;s possible that somewhere in the organization that penned those words, someone might&#039;ve been gunning for Ryan. At least as possible as your &quot;It was an Obama mole!&quot; theory. Especially since back when that came out, Obama was busy fighting in the Democratic primary, and would hardly have bothered gunning against one of the many contenders for the Republican nomination.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drew @ 99</p>
<p>I lived in Chicago then&#8230;and back when the Trib editorial page said this about Jim Ryan (back when he f-cked up a death penalty case):</p>
<p> &#8220;Those who did wrong or were derelict also must be held to account. At the top of this list must be Illinois Atty. Gen. Jim Ryan&#8230;none of those involved in the Cruz prosecution deserves ever again to enjoy a position of public honor or trust. They have demonstrated that they have no honor and they merit no trust.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s possible that somewhere in the organization that penned those words, someone might&#8217;ve been gunning for Ryan. At least as possible as your &#8220;It was an Obama mole!&#8221; theory. Especially since back when that came out, Obama was busy fighting in the Democratic primary, and would hardly have bothered gunning against one of the many contenders for the Republican nomination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkD</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/01/11/your-big-fat-election-brain-dump-11108/#comment-10197</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MarkD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=291#comment-10197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bloomberg is no Perot.  He isn&#039;t even a Nader.  What few votes he does draw will be from Democrats.

Rudy vs Hillary - are neither of them nanny staters enough that we need Mayor Mike?

Let&#039;s assume Thompson vs Clinton - do you really think any Thompson voters will go for Bloomberg?  I can see some Democrats believing that the Clintons have spent quite enough time in the White House.

I don&#039;t see any likely match-up where Bloomberg hurts the Republicans.  I don&#039;t think he&#039;ll run.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bloomberg is no Perot.  He isn&#8217;t even a Nader.  What few votes he does draw will be from Democrats.</p>
<p>Rudy vs Hillary &#8211; are neither of them nanny staters enough that we need Mayor Mike?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s assume Thompson vs Clinton &#8211; do you really think any Thompson voters will go for Bloomberg?  I can see some Democrats believing that the Clintons have spent quite enough time in the White House.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see any likely match-up where Bloomberg hurts the Republicans.  I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;ll run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Eric</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/01/11/your-big-fat-election-brain-dump-11108/#comment-10196</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[An Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=291#comment-10196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure that link took: &quot;Meet Janet Huckabee&quot; here:

http://www.mikehuckabee.com/?FuseAction=About.MeetJanet]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure that link took: &#8220;Meet Janet Huckabee&#8221; here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mikehuckabee.com/?FuseAction=About.MeetJanet" rel="nofollow">http://www.mikehuckabee.com/?FuseAction=About.MeetJanet</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Eric</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/01/11/your-big-fat-election-brain-dump-11108/#comment-10195</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[An Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=291#comment-10195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was trying to come up with a witty reply to John&#039;s question, so I went to the Huckabee campaign webpage and discovered that &lt;a&gt;Jon H. is absolutely right--Janet Huckabee could almost be Mike Huckabee&#039;s sister&lt;/a&gt;.  Where are they from again?  Arkansas, you say?

I&#039;ve got nothing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was trying to come up with a witty reply to John&#8217;s question, so I went to the Huckabee campaign webpage and discovered that <a>Jon H. is absolutely right&#8211;Janet Huckabee could almost be Mike Huckabee&#8217;s sister</a>.  Where are they from again?  Arkansas, you say?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Scalzi</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/01/11/your-big-fat-election-brain-dump-11108/#comment-10194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Scalzi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=291#comment-10194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[She looks like him when she&#039;s in a dress? Who does she look like when she wears a pantsuit?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She looks like him when she&#8217;s in a dress? Who does she look like when she wears a pantsuit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon H</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/01/11/your-big-fat-election-brain-dump-11108/#comment-10193</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon H]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=291#comment-10193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Huckabee is a theocrat.&quot;

And his wife looks disturbingly like him, in a dress.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Huckabee is a theocrat.&#8221;</p>
<p>And his wife looks disturbingly like him, in a dress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Raven</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/01/11/your-big-fat-election-brain-dump-11108/#comment-10192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Raven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=291#comment-10192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Caw!

Y&#039;know, John McCain&#039;s good rep is pretty much a media creation entire. &lt;i&gt;And&lt;/i&gt; he has supported the Bushies every step of the way; if the man has any integrity, he keeps it well hidden.

Hilary Clinton has never repudiated her pro-Iraqi-war vote.

Obama&#039;s health care plan had big problems, and he viciously attacked Paul Krugman for pointing them out.

Huckabee is a theocrat. Ron Paul is probably an American fascist.

Lots more food for corvids. Me, I&#039;m for Odin.

Caw! Caw! Caw!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caw!</p>
<p>Y&#8217;know, John McCain&#8217;s good rep is pretty much a media creation entire. <i>And</i> he has supported the Bushies every step of the way; if the man has any integrity, he keeps it well hidden.</p>
<p>Hilary Clinton has never repudiated her pro-Iraqi-war vote.</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s health care plan had big problems, and he viciously attacked Paul Krugman for pointing them out.</p>
<p>Huckabee is a theocrat. Ron Paul is probably an American fascist.</p>
<p>Lots more food for corvids. Me, I&#8217;m for Odin.</p>
<p>Caw! Caw! Caw!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

