<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Big Idea: David J. Williams</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/05/27/the-big-idea-david-j-williams/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/05/27/the-big-idea-david-j-williams/</link>
	<description>DEVISING A SYSTEM FOR REMEMBERING EVERYTHING</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:34:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David J. Williams</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/05/27/the-big-idea-david-j-williams/#comment-30593</link>
		<dc:creator>David J. Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 00:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=809#comment-30593</guid>
		<description>With regards to the most recent post, the short answer is that I absolutely regard the tenets of 4G warfare as a valid description of the here-and-now.  The question is what&#039;s next.

And as to the long answer:  www.autumnrain2110.com, for the latest post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With regards to the most recent post, the short answer is that I absolutely regard the tenets of 4G warfare as a valid description of the here-and-now.  The question is what&#8217;s next.</p>
<p>And as to the long answer:  <a href="http://www.autumnrain2110.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.autumnrain2110.com</a>, for the latest post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/05/27/the-big-idea-david-j-williams/#comment-30592</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 20:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=809#comment-30592</guid>
		<description>This book is sitting in my Amazon shopping cart right now and I&#039;ll be buying it on payday (tomorrow! woo!), but I&#039;m curious about the Cold War build-up concept.

With evolution pushing war toward a fourth generation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_generation_warfare), why would you bother militarizing space?  Honestly, I can&#039;t envision any situation in which a spysat would be useful against small-contingent insurgencies.

Honestly, it seems like the best thing for national militaries to do going forward is to integrate more tightly with their respective national security agencies, trim the size of their conventional forces and strategic nuclear forces, and build the hell out of their special ops groups.

I&#039;d love to hear from the author about how 4th-Gen Warfare played into the writing of the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This book is sitting in my Amazon shopping cart right now and I&#8217;ll be buying it on payday (tomorrow! woo!), but I&#8217;m curious about the Cold War build-up concept.</p>
<p>With evolution pushing war toward a fourth generation (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_generation_warfare" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_generation_warfare</a>), why would you bother militarizing space?  Honestly, I can&#8217;t envision any situation in which a spysat would be useful against small-contingent insurgencies.</p>
<p>Honestly, it seems like the best thing for national militaries to do going forward is to integrate more tightly with their respective national security agencies, trim the size of their conventional forces and strategic nuclear forces, and build the hell out of their special ops groups.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to hear from the author about how 4th-Gen Warfare played into the writing of the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David J. Williams</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/05/27/the-big-idea-david-j-williams/#comment-30589</link>
		<dc:creator>David J. Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 01:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=809#comment-30589</guid>
		<description>My thanks to Scalzi for posting my essay.  It&#039;s great to see such a lively discussion, and particularly interesting that the Whither Russia question became the focus of it.  I&#039;ve got some thoughts on my blog, but in the meantime thanks a ton to everyone for chiming in . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My thanks to Scalzi for posting my essay.  It&#8217;s great to see such a lively discussion, and particularly interesting that the Whither Russia question became the focus of it.  I&#8217;ve got some thoughts on my blog, but in the meantime thanks a ton to everyone for chiming in . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/05/27/the-big-idea-david-j-williams/#comment-30580</link>
		<dc:creator>rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 22:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=809#comment-30580</guid>
		<description>JJ - why? See my comment above... If this were set in 2030 I&#039;d agree with you and Alan... but a LOT can happen in the next 100 or more years and to assume that 2108 will look much like 2015 is shortsighted.

Also... you know.. future history does NOT have to be OUR future history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JJ &#8211; why? See my comment above&#8230; If this were set in 2030 I&#8217;d agree with you and Alan&#8230; but a LOT can happen in the next 100 or more years and to assume that 2108 will look much like 2015 is shortsighted.</p>
<p>Also&#8230; you know.. future history does NOT have to be OUR future history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/05/27/the-big-idea-david-j-williams/#comment-30590</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 13:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=809#comment-30590</guid>
		<description>I think post #1 is exactly right.

The future belongs to the people who show up for it.  The Russians aren&#039;t.  Any &quot;future history&quot; that has them not just as a &quot;powerful nation&quot; but as a leading world power has got a whole lot of &#039;splaining to do before I buy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think post #1 is exactly right.</p>
<p>The future belongs to the people who show up for it.  The Russians aren&#8217;t.  Any &#8220;future history&#8221; that has them not just as a &#8220;powerful nation&#8221; but as a leading world power has got a whole lot of &#8217;splaining to do before I buy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean L.</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/05/27/the-big-idea-david-j-williams/#comment-30591</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 12:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=809#comment-30591</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s worth a lot, PNH.

And I&#039;m quite interested by the Big Idea presented here; I think I&#039;ll pick up the book.

As to whether or not it&#039;s &#039;probable&#039;; I think Putin is doing quite a bit to stop their &#039;decline&#039;. That doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s going to work, but it does mean that they are much stronger than they looked like they were going to be after the collapse of the USSR. In a more sociological sense, the Russian spirit is an indomitable one, and I don&#039;t expect to see a slow, gradual collapse anytime soon. At least, not on the outside.

Perhaps historians will point out all the signs after it happens, but we in the present will most likely be blissfully unaware until the day it happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s worth a lot, PNH.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m quite interested by the Big Idea presented here; I think I&#8217;ll pick up the book.</p>
<p>As to whether or not it&#8217;s &#8216;probable&#8217;; I think Putin is doing quite a bit to stop their &#8216;decline&#8217;. That doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s going to work, but it does mean that they are much stronger than they looked like they were going to be after the collapse of the USSR. In a more sociological sense, the Russian spirit is an indomitable one, and I don&#8217;t expect to see a slow, gradual collapse anytime soon. At least, not on the outside.</p>
<p>Perhaps historians will point out all the signs after it happens, but we in the present will most likely be blissfully unaware until the day it happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/05/27/the-big-idea-david-j-williams/#comment-30579</link>
		<dc:creator>rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 04:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=809#comment-30579</guid>
		<description>Alan...

So? Your assertion in post 1 is wrong. Any future history *that purports to be a straightline projection of the present* might have to take Russia&#039;s decline into account. But remember, 150 years ago Russia was a formidable world power, the US was not and, in general, our current world wasn&#039;t the one you would have envisioned.

And, you know... if  you&#039;d like to write a future history, go for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan&#8230;</p>
<p>So? Your assertion in post 1 is wrong. Any future history *that purports to be a straightline projection of the present* might have to take Russia&#8217;s decline into account. But remember, 150 years ago Russia was a formidable world power, the US was not and, in general, our current world wasn&#8217;t the one you would have envisioned.</p>
<p>And, you know&#8230; if  you&#8217;d like to write a future history, go for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Kellogg</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/05/27/the-big-idea-david-j-williams/#comment-30585</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Kellogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 04:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=809#comment-30585</guid>
		<description>Laur, #2

Follow the demographics. Russia is losing 0.5% of her population every year. Russia is sick. Her health system has collapsed; her land, water,and air is polluted; she is racked by rebellion, and her infrastructure is either crumbling or has disappeared altogether.

And we and the Russians lie about it. We lie because we refuse to face up to the danger Russia&#039;s collapse poses to the world. Russia lies because of pride, and fear of what could happen were people to realize what&#039;s going on.

Williams presents an interesting alternate future history, but it&#039;s not a possible future history for our world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laur, #2</p>
<p>Follow the demographics. Russia is losing 0.5% of her population every year. Russia is sick. Her health system has collapsed; her land, water,and air is polluted; she is racked by rebellion, and her infrastructure is either crumbling or has disappeared altogether.</p>
<p>And we and the Russians lie about it. We lie because we refuse to face up to the danger Russia&#8217;s collapse poses to the world. Russia lies because of pride, and fear of what could happen were people to realize what&#8217;s going on.</p>
<p>Williams presents an interesting alternate future history, but it&#8217;s not a possible future history for our world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Nielsen Hayden</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/05/27/the-big-idea-david-j-williams/#comment-30587</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Nielsen Hayden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 03:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=809#comment-30587</guid>
		<description>FWIW, David Whatsisname Williams was one of my Clarion students last year, and his book is good stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW, David Whatsisname Williams was one of my Clarion students last year, and his book is good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Louis Edelman</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/05/27/the-big-idea-david-j-williams/#comment-30578</link>
		<dc:creator>David Louis Edelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 01:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=809#comment-30578</guid>
		<description>JJ @ #4: In fairness to Bantam Spectra, it should be pointed out that on the actual final front cover, they went with a much snappier blurb by Peter Watts. (&quot;Explodes out the gate like a sonic boom and never stops... The razors of &lt;em&gt;The Mirrored Heavens&lt;/em&gt; would eat cyberpunk&#039;s old-guard hackers and cowboys as a light snack.&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JJ @ #4: In fairness to Bantam Spectra, it should be pointed out that on the actual final front cover, they went with a much snappier blurb by Peter Watts. (&#8220;Explodes out the gate like a sonic boom and never stops&#8230; The razors of <em>The Mirrored Heavens</em> would eat cyberpunk&#8217;s old-guard hackers and cowboys as a light snack.&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
