<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today&#8217;s Dumb Headline</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/07/01/todays-dumb-headline/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/07/01/todays-dumb-headline/</link>
	<description>I FORGET WHAT EIGHT WAS FOR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:57:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Scalzi</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/07/01/todays-dumb-headline/#comment-36903</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Scalzi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=964#comment-36903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SpeedyEd:

&quot;he did five months.&quot;

Five months more than Bush, however. Which is to my point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SpeedyEd:</p>
<p>&#8220;he did five months.&#8221;</p>
<p>Five months more than Bush, however. Which is to my point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpeedyEd</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/07/01/todays-dumb-headline/#comment-36902</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SpeedyEd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=964#comment-36902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Al Gore did NOT serve in Vietnam for two years.  The standard tour in country was one year, and he did five months.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/gorevietnam.asp

He served one year, ten months in the Army.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al Gore did NOT serve in Vietnam for two years.  The standard tour in country was one year, and he did five months.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/gorevietnam.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/gorevietnam.asp</a></p>
<p>He served one year, ten months in the Army.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Barish</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/07/01/todays-dumb-headline/#comment-36901</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Barish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=964#comment-36901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I realize I&#039;m late to the dance, but it seems to me the issue should be the quality of your military service, not the length, position, or rank achieved.  Just like it should be the quality of your work at any profession.  IMHO, there is no military service that adequately prepares you to be President of the United States.  As Commander-in-Chief, the President exercises executive authority over all instruments of US national power...and that goes far beyond &quot;the military.&quot;

A military record, to me (a veteran), shows an inclination in the direction of service to the country, as do many other forms of service (peace corps, cyber corps, even positions with NGOs).  It doesn&#039;t automatically make someone a great commander, let alone President, but it is different than &quot;holding a job.&quot;  McCain should rightfully be respected for his service and obvious sacrifice while in uniform, but that doesn&#039;t automatically make him a superior candidate to Obama, who should be respected in his own right for his service in state and federal offices.

I think the election OUGHT to be about (and probably won&#039;t) different ideas, and the candidates&#039; vision for our country, who we should be for the next 4 years, and the policies he&#039;ll enact.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize I&#8217;m late to the dance, but it seems to me the issue should be the quality of your military service, not the length, position, or rank achieved.  Just like it should be the quality of your work at any profession.  IMHO, there is no military service that adequately prepares you to be President of the United States.  As Commander-in-Chief, the President exercises executive authority over all instruments of US national power&#8230;and that goes far beyond &#8220;the military.&#8221;</p>
<p>A military record, to me (a veteran), shows an inclination in the direction of service to the country, as do many other forms of service (peace corps, cyber corps, even positions with NGOs).  It doesn&#8217;t automatically make someone a great commander, let alone President, but it is different than &#8220;holding a job.&#8221;  McCain should rightfully be respected for his service and obvious sacrifice while in uniform, but that doesn&#8217;t automatically make him a superior candidate to Obama, who should be respected in his own right for his service in state and federal offices.</p>
<p>I think the election OUGHT to be about (and probably won&#8217;t) different ideas, and the candidates&#8217; vision for our country, who we should be for the next 4 years, and the policies he&#8217;ll enact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dube</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/07/01/todays-dumb-headline/#comment-36900</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dube]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 22:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=964#comment-36900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow. I didn&#039;t realize it had been so long since someone who served in the military was president. That&#039;s just sad. :(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I didn&#8217;t realize it had been so long since someone who served in the military was president. That&#8217;s just sad. :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nargel</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/07/01/todays-dumb-headline/#comment-36897</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nargel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=964#comment-36897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Upon review of your wiki entry it seems fairly convincing but it still does not match up with the film that I saw.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upon review of your wiki entry it seems fairly convincing but it still does not match up with the film that I saw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nargel</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/07/01/todays-dumb-headline/#comment-36898</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nargel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=964#comment-36898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have seen film of the incident and McCain&#039;s plane was not aligned as you state.  I would assume that the navy investigation (at the time) and conclusions that were forced out into the public view only under FOIA would be a tad bit more reliable than a wikipedia entry.

The Navy&#039;s, at the time, conclusion was that McCain&#039;s wet start stunt cooked off the Zuni.  I will also point out that the pilot of the plane the Zuni came from died in the incident which would have been a bit less likely if, rather than being right behind McCain, he was all the way over on the other side of the flight deck.

Also, if McCain was a &quot;victim&quot; here why was he immediately (and the only one) kicked off the ship?  I can see the captain saying &quot;I can&#039;t keelhaul him but I want that Admiral&#039;s....son off my ship before he kills anybody else.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen film of the incident and McCain&#8217;s plane was not aligned as you state.  I would assume that the navy investigation (at the time) and conclusions that were forced out into the public view only under FOIA would be a tad bit more reliable than a wikipedia entry.</p>
<p>The Navy&#8217;s, at the time, conclusion was that McCain&#8217;s wet start stunt cooked off the Zuni.  I will also point out that the pilot of the plane the Zuni came from died in the incident which would have been a bit less likely if, rather than being right behind McCain, he was all the way over on the other side of the flight deck.</p>
<p>Also, if McCain was a &#8220;victim&#8221; here why was he immediately (and the only one) kicked off the ship?  I can see the captain saying &#8220;I can&#8217;t keelhaul him but I want that Admiral&#8217;s&#8230;.son off my ship before he kills anybody else.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick V.</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/07/01/todays-dumb-headline/#comment-36899</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick V.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 19:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=964#comment-36899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nargel @ 60

The Zuni that struck McCain&#039;s A-4 came from an F-4 on the OPPOSITE side of the flight deck from McCain. The tailpipe of McCain&#039;s A-4 was pointed out over the ocean.

The Zuni was fired when the F-4&#039;s pilot switched power from the gen cart to internal batteries. The switch over caused a short on the firing circuit because 1)they the F-4&#039;s crew chief had plugged in the Zuni pod upon loading instead of just after hooking up to the catapault - as an approved unofficial time saving measure and 2) the safety pin was missing because the wind blowing over the deck had pulled the long red tag attached to the pin enough to pull it out.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1967_USS_Forrestal_fire for a diagram of the positions of McCain&#039;s A-4 and the firing F-4.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nargel @ 60</p>
<p>The Zuni that struck McCain&#8217;s A-4 came from an F-4 on the OPPOSITE side of the flight deck from McCain. The tailpipe of McCain&#8217;s A-4 was pointed out over the ocean.</p>
<p>The Zuni was fired when the F-4&#8242;s pilot switched power from the gen cart to internal batteries. The switch over caused a short on the firing circuit because 1)they the F-4&#8242;s crew chief had plugged in the Zuni pod upon loading instead of just after hooking up to the catapault &#8211; as an approved unofficial time saving measure and 2) the safety pin was missing because the wind blowing over the deck had pulled the long red tag attached to the pin enough to pull it out.</p>
<p>See <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1967_USS_Forrestal_fire" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1967_USS_Forrestal_fire</a> for a diagram of the positions of McCain&#8217;s A-4 and the firing F-4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nargel</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/07/01/todays-dumb-headline/#comment-36874</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nargel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 04:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=964#comment-36874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He caused the incident by performing a &quot;wet start&quot; (bullshit hotdog stunt) which cooked off the rocket on the plane behind him.  He also knew that the 1,000 lb. bombs on his plane were on weak 500 lb. rated pylons  and would (and did) arm, fall and cook-off.  The investigation report was not released until forced out under FOIA request.

In essence, McCain deliberately flamethrowered the plane behind him which cooked off the Zuni rocket which hit his fuel tank and ultimately dropped his known to be overloaded bombs.

McCain was quickly transferred (the only Forrestal crewman to be immediatly transferred) to the USS Oriskany.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He caused the incident by performing a &#8220;wet start&#8221; (bullshit hotdog stunt) which cooked off the rocket on the plane behind him.  He also knew that the 1,000 lb. bombs on his plane were on weak 500 lb. rated pylons  and would (and did) arm, fall and cook-off.  The investigation report was not released until forced out under FOIA request.</p>
<p>In essence, McCain deliberately flamethrowered the plane behind him which cooked off the Zuni rocket which hit his fuel tank and ultimately dropped his known to be overloaded bombs.</p>
<p>McCain was quickly transferred (the only Forrestal crewman to be immediatly transferred) to the USS Oriskany.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick V.</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/07/01/todays-dumb-headline/#comment-36873</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick V.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 03:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=964#comment-36873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nargel @ 58

While McCain was on Forrestal during the incident you mentioned, he was a victim there. His A4 was the one hit by a Zuni rocket fired accidentally from across the deck.

There is film of McCain climbing out his cockpit, walking along the refueling probe and jumping down into the burning deck.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nargel @ 58</p>
<p>While McCain was on Forrestal during the incident you mentioned, he was a victim there. His A4 was the one hit by a Zuni rocket fired accidentally from across the deck.</p>
<p>There is film of McCain climbing out his cockpit, walking along the refueling probe and jumping down into the burning deck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nargel</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/07/01/todays-dumb-headline/#comment-36896</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nargel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 01:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=964#comment-36896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Graves

Despite your interesting take on the VA, I suppose I should point out that that the voting records shown in my excerpt involved the Disabled American Veterans, Iraq and Afganistan Veterans and the Retired Enlisted Association not the VA (simply groups that are concerned about what happens to their fellows once they are no longer ,hmm, active service [even if involuntarily]).

shellybear

If we are looking at the *type* of service then the type of service that put the USS Forrestal into drydock for 2 years and killed well over 100 fellow seamen is not the kind of service I want running my government.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Graves</p>
<p>Despite your interesting take on the VA, I suppose I should point out that that the voting records shown in my excerpt involved the Disabled American Veterans, Iraq and Afganistan Veterans and the Retired Enlisted Association not the VA (simply groups that are concerned about what happens to their fellows once they are no longer ,hmm, active service [even if involuntarily]).</p>
<p>shellybear</p>
<p>If we are looking at the *type* of service then the type of service that put the USS Forrestal into drydock for 2 years and killed well over 100 fellow seamen is not the kind of service I want running my government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

