<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Internets Hate Scalzi!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/03/10/the-internets-hate-scalzi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/03/10/the-internets-hate-scalzi/</link>
	<description>I FORGET WHAT EIGHT WAS FOR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:58:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Scalzi</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/03/10/the-internets-hate-scalzi/#comment-134874</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Scalzi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatever.scalzi.com/?p=6596#comment-134874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And this is where I cap off this particular thread. Thanks everyone for participating here. 

Don&#039;t worry, &lt;a href=&quot;http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/03/12/mary-ann-mohanraj-gets-you-up-to-speed-part-i/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&#039;s a new entry for more conversations along some of these themes&lt;/a&gt;, guest-posted by Mary Anne Mohanraj. Enjoy. 

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And this is where I cap off this particular thread. Thanks everyone for participating here. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry, <a href="http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/03/12/mary-ann-mohanraj-gets-you-up-to-speed-part-i/" rel="nofollow">here&#8217;s a new entry for more conversations along some of these themes</a>, guest-posted by Mary Anne Mohanraj. Enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Anne Mohanraj</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/03/10/the-internets-hate-scalzi/#comment-134872</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary Anne Mohanraj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatever.scalzi.com/?p=6596#comment-134872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For what it&#039;s worth, Greg, I said in my initial post on the subject that &quot;I&#039;ve been saddened by the behavior of people I know, on both sides of the RaceFail &#039;09 imbroglio.&quot;  I didn&#039;t call out specific instances of PoC behaving badly because as far as I know, there&#039;s no documented evidence of them doing anything like:

 - outing people
 - harassing people in real life
 - etc.

I called out specific white folks who did cross the line from insults to damaging action.  The mere insults were flying so freely by the time I entered the discussion that it seemed pointless to even try to track them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, Greg, I said in my initial post on the subject that &#8220;I&#8217;ve been saddened by the behavior of people I know, on both sides of the RaceFail &#8217;09 imbroglio.&#8221;  I didn&#8217;t call out specific instances of PoC behaving badly because as far as I know, there&#8217;s no documented evidence of them doing anything like:</p>
<p> &#8211; outing people<br />
 &#8211; harassing people in real life<br />
 &#8211; etc.</p>
<p>I called out specific white folks who did cross the line from insults to damaging action.  The mere insults were flying so freely by the time I entered the discussion that it seemed pointless to even try to track them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Jasper</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/03/10/the-internets-hate-scalzi/#comment-134871</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh Jasper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatever.scalzi.com/?p=6596#comment-134871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another two suggestions - Join the Livejournal Community &lt;a href=&quot;http://community.livejournal.com/con_or_bust/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Con Or Bust&lt;/a&gt; which is a fan fund devoted to getting people of colour to Wiscon, and donate, or bid on some of the merchandise/services.

Or donate to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.carlbrandon.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Carl Brandon Society&lt;/a&gt; which is an awards society inspired by the Tiptree awards, also at Wiscon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another two suggestions &#8211; Join the Livejournal Community <a href="http://community.livejournal.com/con_or_bust/" rel="nofollow">Con Or Bust</a> which is a fan fund devoted to getting people of colour to Wiscon, and donate, or bid on some of the merchandise/services.</p>
<p>Or donate to <a href="http://www.carlbrandon.org/" rel="nofollow">The Carl Brandon Society</a> which is an awards society inspired by the Tiptree awards, also at Wiscon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheila</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/03/10/the-internets-hate-scalzi/#comment-134864</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheila]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatever.scalzi.com/?p=6596#comment-134864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have nothing more to say to Greg, because he clearly has no genuine interest in what I&#039;m saying, only in how he can harvest my words to stuff his personal strawman, and ignore completely any point I make that won&#039;t fit that purpose.

I hope the fruit that has been borne of this discussions will lead to greater things.

I, likewise, am done.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have nothing more to say to Greg, because he clearly has no genuine interest in what I&#8217;m saying, only in how he can harvest my words to stuff his personal strawman, and ignore completely any point I make that won&#8217;t fit that purpose.</p>
<p>I hope the fruit that has been borne of this discussions will lead to greater things.</p>
<p>I, likewise, am done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tully</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/03/10/the-internets-hate-scalzi/#comment-134863</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tully]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatever.scalzi.com/?p=6596#comment-134863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, I&#039;m just pushing it one comment closer to the cut-off mark.

Kudos to John for an interesting and elightening and voluminous thread, well-moderated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I&#8217;m just pushing it one comment closer to the cut-off mark.</p>
<p>Kudos to John for an interesting and elightening and voluminous thread, well-moderated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMQ</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/03/10/the-internets-hate-scalzi/#comment-134861</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SMQ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatever.scalzi.com/?p=6596#comment-134861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greg @ 744:
&lt;i&gt;I’m white, so I’m not participating, you know, unless of course, I’m guilty of white privilege and not participating enough.&lt;/i&gt;

Now you&#039;re putting words in my mouth.  You&#039;ve certainly participated in &lt;i&gt;this&lt;/i&gt; discussion--and most lucidly--but somewhere way upthread you indicated you hadn&#039;t even been aware of the broader discussion until Scalzi linked to it.  That&#039;s all I meant by saying you&#039;re a bystander.  So am I.

&lt;i&gt;Yeah, I don’t think I ever demanded anyone apologize &lt;/i&gt;to me.

No, you&#039;ve declared that you want someone to say they&#039;ve crossed a line into clearly unacceptable behavior.  I have no idea why you want to hear someone else affirm your judgment of the discussion, but it seems that no one here will do so.  For myself, the reason I won&#039;t do so is that I don&#039;t believe I have the standing make that judgment, and I don&#039;t believe you do either.

And again, yes, thanks, John, for hosting, and thanks everyone--Greg included--for the discussion.

--SMQ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg @ 744:<br />
<i>I’m white, so I’m not participating, you know, unless of course, I’m guilty of white privilege and not participating enough.</i></p>
<p>Now you&#8217;re putting words in my mouth.  You&#8217;ve certainly participated in <i>this</i> discussion&#8211;and most lucidly&#8211;but somewhere way upthread you indicated you hadn&#8217;t even been aware of the broader discussion until Scalzi linked to it.  That&#8217;s all I meant by saying you&#8217;re a bystander.  So am I.</p>
<p><i>Yeah, I don’t think I ever demanded anyone apologize </i>to me.</p>
<p>No, you&#8217;ve declared that you want someone to say they&#8217;ve crossed a line into clearly unacceptable behavior.  I have no idea why you want to hear someone else affirm your judgment of the discussion, but it seems that no one here will do so.  For myself, the reason I won&#8217;t do so is that I don&#8217;t believe I have the standing make that judgment, and I don&#8217;t believe you do either.</p>
<p>And again, yes, thanks, John, for hosting, and thanks everyone&#8211;Greg included&#8211;for the discussion.</p>
<p>&#8211;SMQ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuhri</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/03/10/the-internets-hate-scalzi/#comment-134859</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yuhri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatever.scalzi.com/?p=6596#comment-134859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greg--

What I said was that, it &quot;&lt;i&gt;can come across as non-inclusive of the other side.&lt;/i&gt;&quot; I didn&#039;t say that you were not being inclusive.  Your indignation is registered, but I don&#039;t think your argument is with me. 

I&#039;m not going to be an apologist for pyros ostensibly on &quot;my&quot; side; I&#039;m not really in a position to apologize for anything but my own actions. Inconsistently, I don&#039;t deal with absolutes when it comes to other people&#039;s actions, but I do for my own. If it makes you feel better, I do not feel that painting an entire race as &quot;racist,&quot; or placing blame on an innocent bystander for all the so-called sins of his nation or his people or his gender or &lt;i&gt;whatever&lt;/i&gt; is called for. &lt;i&gt;Specific to that case&lt;/i&gt;, I am in agreement. This doesn&#039;t mean I can&#039;t see the causes that lead to the actions, nor do I see anything in your writing that leads me to think you don&#039;t either. Explanation is not an excuse, however, and I think that might be where there&#039;s been disconnect.

I have seen several POC posters cracking down on comments on their blogs that were the scorch-and-burn type that you mention, saying that they were not helpful and that they were out of line. If there is an apology needed there, I don&#039;t think they&#039;re responsible for making it. My read from your comments is that you don&#039;t feel you should have to apologize for racist comments that other white writers have made, nor do I think you should have to. Are we keeping points now about which side has apologized more? That sounds about as useful as the karmic points you&#039;re referring to above. 

That aside: Ostensibly there&#039;re people paying me for doing actual work, and ... I should probably do that. Ahem.


By the by, Greg: samoas. Made from real girl scouts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg&#8211;</p>
<p>What I said was that, it &#8220;<i>can come across as non-inclusive of the other side.</i>&#8221; I didn&#8217;t say that you were not being inclusive.  Your indignation is registered, but I don&#8217;t think your argument is with me. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to be an apologist for pyros ostensibly on &#8220;my&#8221; side; I&#8217;m not really in a position to apologize for anything but my own actions. Inconsistently, I don&#8217;t deal with absolutes when it comes to other people&#8217;s actions, but I do for my own. If it makes you feel better, I do not feel that painting an entire race as &#8220;racist,&#8221; or placing blame on an innocent bystander for all the so-called sins of his nation or his people or his gender or <i>whatever</i> is called for. <i>Specific to that case</i>, I am in agreement. This doesn&#8217;t mean I can&#8217;t see the causes that lead to the actions, nor do I see anything in your writing that leads me to think you don&#8217;t either. Explanation is not an excuse, however, and I think that might be where there&#8217;s been disconnect.</p>
<p>I have seen several POC posters cracking down on comments on their blogs that were the scorch-and-burn type that you mention, saying that they were not helpful and that they were out of line. If there is an apology needed there, I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re responsible for making it. My read from your comments is that you don&#8217;t feel you should have to apologize for racist comments that other white writers have made, nor do I think you should have to. Are we keeping points now about which side has apologized more? That sounds about as useful as the karmic points you&#8217;re referring to above. </p>
<p>That aside: Ostensibly there&#8217;re people paying me for doing actual work, and &#8230; I should probably do that. Ahem.</p>
<p>By the by, Greg: samoas. Made from real girl scouts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg London</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/03/10/the-internets-hate-scalzi/#comment-134853</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg London]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatever.scalzi.com/?p=6596#comment-134853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Yes, everyone is responsible for their own actions, but they’re not answerable to you for them.&lt;/i&gt;

Yeah, I don&#039;t think I ever demanded anyone apologize &lt;i&gt;to me&lt;/i&gt;.

&lt;i&gt;I’m not saying that there are no lines, or that none have been crossed; I’m saying that it’s the participants in the discussion that get to draw the lines, not the bystanders.&lt;/i&gt;

Ah, so, the &lt;i&gt;mob&lt;/i&gt; gets to draw the lines. Nice turn of the phrase. I&#039;m white, so I&#039;m not &lt;i&gt;participating&lt;/i&gt;, you know, unless of course, I&#039;m guilty of white privilege and not participating enough. And as the FAQ on white privilege says, if you&#039;ve got privilege, the best thing you can do? Listen to the mob. It&#039;s all a perfectly hermetically sealed system of rules that always brings it back to the same conclusion: the mob is right.

Good one you.

That would also explain why the mob never has to apologize for the actions of any of its members.


John, I&#039;m really, really sorry. I know I made extra work for you keeping an eye on this thread. And you&#039;re a better man than me for how you&#039;ve dealt with it and this whole mess.

I&#039;m done.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Yes, everyone is responsible for their own actions, but they’re not answerable to you for them.</i></p>
<p>Yeah, I don&#8217;t think I ever demanded anyone apologize <i>to me</i>.</p>
<p><i>I’m not saying that there are no lines, or that none have been crossed; I’m saying that it’s the participants in the discussion that get to draw the lines, not the bystanders.</i></p>
<p>Ah, so, the <i>mob</i> gets to draw the lines. Nice turn of the phrase. I&#8217;m white, so I&#8217;m not <i>participating</i>, you know, unless of course, I&#8217;m guilty of white privilege and not participating enough. And as the FAQ on white privilege says, if you&#8217;ve got privilege, the best thing you can do? Listen to the mob. It&#8217;s all a perfectly hermetically sealed system of rules that always brings it back to the same conclusion: the mob is right.</p>
<p>Good one you.</p>
<p>That would also explain why the mob never has to apologize for the actions of any of its members.</p>
<p>John, I&#8217;m really, really sorry. I know I made extra work for you keeping an eye on this thread. And you&#8217;re a better man than me for how you&#8217;ve dealt with it and this whole mess.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erika</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/03/10/the-internets-hate-scalzi/#comment-134851</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erika]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatever.scalzi.com/?p=6596#comment-134851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want to thank everyone for what has been an emotionally draining and painful experience, but in a good way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to thank everyone for what has been an emotionally draining and painful experience, but in a good way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: htom</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/03/10/the-internets-hate-scalzi/#comment-134850</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[htom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatever.scalzi.com/?p=6596#comment-134850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Someone throwing napalm is probably not interested in hitting particular targets, but in causing general damage and uproar. (True for both literal and figurative napalm.) Expecting such figurative throwers to step forward and explain or apologize for the consequences of their acts is an enjoyable fantasy, but that&#039;s all it almost always is. Throw and run, or throw and deny throwing, are their methods, and it&#039;s rare that they do &lt;i&gt;anything else&lt;/i&gt;. Put out the flames, repair the repairable, and ignore them (well, watch for them to come back, I suppose.)

I&#039;ve enjoyed the discussion. It has made me perhaps more aware of white privilege, and definitely more aware of how others see it. Everyone (it seems to me) brings a whole freight-car of baggage to any encounter, and it&#039;s almost a miracle that we have as much peacefulness as we do. Even after you&#039;ve shoveled away a whole trainload, there is still more there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone throwing napalm is probably not interested in hitting particular targets, but in causing general damage and uproar. (True for both literal and figurative napalm.) Expecting such figurative throwers to step forward and explain or apologize for the consequences of their acts is an enjoyable fantasy, but that&#8217;s all it almost always is. Throw and run, or throw and deny throwing, are their methods, and it&#8217;s rare that they do <i>anything else</i>. Put out the flames, repair the repairable, and ignore them (well, watch for them to come back, I suppose.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve enjoyed the discussion. It has made me perhaps more aware of white privilege, and definitely more aware of how others see it. Everyone (it seems to me) brings a whole freight-car of baggage to any encounter, and it&#8217;s almost a miracle that we have as much peacefulness as we do. Even after you&#8217;ve shoveled away a whole trainload, there is still more there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

