And Now, Simply Because, An Arty Picture of My Wife

I think it would make a good book jacket photo, personally. So arty. So serious. So “my husband has Photoshop and is not afraid to fiddle.” Yes, well. Guilty as charged.

18 thoughts on “And Now, Simply Because, An Arty Picture of My Wife

  1. Nicely done though. I adore portraits done that way: side-lit, monochrome. Did you do any over-painting in PS (picking out details), or is it all filters and effects?

    Also, have you seen the ‘Watchmen: Portraits’ book yet? There’s some stunning monochrome portraits in that.

  2. Dee:

    Mostly filter and effects, although I did use the unsharp mask to bring some stuff back into focus. Haven’t seen the Watchmen: Portraits book yet, but I’ll keep an eye out for it.

  3. that was supposed to be “Nifty” but i do not proof read my stuff lol.

    *FAIL* (To myself Not you)

  4. A little more Sharpness, I think…I keep squinting at it to try and pull it into focus. Gaussian Blur is not always your buddy.

    The light composition, though….that’s just gorgeous, good job :)

  5. *peers* I see you’ve left the colour in the irises. I’m not a huge fan of these partially-coloured black-and-white things myself – the picture works so well as plain black and white it seems a shame to resort to gimmickry.

  6. “my husband has Photoshop and is not afraid to fiddle.”

    Are these two things connected, or are you telling more about your personal life than we need to know?

  7. I, too, like the lighting and the composition, but I agree with others that the focus is a little too soft. Just curious, did you blur that using Gaussian Blur, or did you rack slightly out of focus when you took the picture?

Comments are closed.