May 17 2009

Previously:
Ahead:

Because Flowcharts Make Everything Clearer

Published by John Scalzi at 12:00 am

Apropos of nothing in particular, here is a handy-dandy flowchart to detail just who does — and who does not – get to be a dick around these here parts:

I do hope this clears up any lingering confusion anyone might have on this subject.

62 responses so far

62 Responses to “Because Flowcharts Make Everything Clearer”

  1. John Scalzion 17 May 2009 at 12:01 am

    Allow me also to note that while I am allowed to be a dick here, I try not to be. Most of the time, anyway.

  2. Nentuabyon 17 May 2009 at 12:10 am

    Surely there’s a certain Kristine who could exercise the privilege if she ever felt it truly called for? ;)

  3. sleeplessinoregonon 17 May 2009 at 12:14 am

    it’s good ta be da king!

  4. William Schaferon 17 May 2009 at 12:23 am

    Dude, you’re being such a dick.

  5. John Scalzion 17 May 2009 at 12:24 am

    Nentuaby:

    I think in the entire time I’d had this site, Krissy has shown up in the comments maybe twice. She has almost no interest in being on the site at all, actually.

  6. skippyon 17 May 2009 at 12:24 am

    was there an incident of dickishness that i missed?

    ’cause those are my favorite incidents of all

  7. Craig Ranapiaon 17 May 2009 at 12:33 am

    I suppose there’s also something else to think about: John Scalzi may be allowed to be a dick here, but if he makes a habit of it people go elsewhere because they get an ample supply of fresh dick closer to home. At least, I think that’s how it works.

  8. BC Woodson 17 May 2009 at 12:46 am

    Does this just apply to metaphorical dicks, or do people who have been turned into giant sentient penises who walk on their testicles and type on giant penis-accessible keyboards still get to comment?

  9. John Scalzion 17 May 2009 at 12:56 am

    BC Woods:

    Theoretically, someone who has been turned into a giant penis, but who was still generally polite and considerate of others when he responded in comments, would be welcome. As a practical matter, people are turned into ambulatory, sentient schlongs so infrequently that the issue really hasn’t presented itself to date.

  10. Mike Crichtonon 17 May 2009 at 1:25 am

    That you _know_ of, John. And now maybe your insensitive attitude has driven your Ambulatory-Sentient-Schlong-American fans away, sobbing quietly onto those special keyboards. Said keyboards are now ruined by their tears, so their one social outlet, the internet, is lost to them forever. Way to go. Dick…

  11. Adrienne Con 17 May 2009 at 1:28 am

    Wil Wheaton says, “Don’t be a dick!”

  12. John VPon 17 May 2009 at 1:39 am

    Your flow chart tricked me. Just after the first two boxes, I was ready to change my name to John Scalzi. But then you slipped in the thing about owning the site. *rats*

    {sourgrapes}
    ah well, being a dick wasn’t that important to me
    {/sourgrapes}

  13. Steven Fisheron 17 May 2009 at 1:53 am

    Totally going to steal this idea for my own website when I get around to it. :)

  14. Melyon 17 May 2009 at 2:14 am

    <3 the scalz.

    I loled. So did the husband.

  15. Tsauroon 17 May 2009 at 2:47 am

    The cool thing is that sometime later we get to read about what actually ticked our esteemed host off.

  16. Nentuabyon 17 May 2009 at 2:51 am

    Scalzi: So I was aware, actually. Hence the clause about “if she ever felt it truly called for.” Nonetheless, the slim chance exists, no? One must account not discount slim possibilities as non-possibilities, if one is to be an irritating pedant. ;)

  17. awake on a trainon 17 May 2009 at 4:29 am

    GOD DAMN IT. I hate when someone is a huge dick, so huge that it warrants a post by the Scalzi himself, and I miss it. By the time I catch up, the dickish posts have been thoroughly moderated and I never know what happened. The curiosity just kills me.

  18. Rodney Graveson 17 May 2009 at 4:47 am

    Your beligerance towards Richards who do not share your opinions is duly noted.

  19. Rodney Graveson 17 May 2009 at 4:57 am

    AOT @ 17

    See http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/05/13/an-ethical-puzzler/ starting at 163.

  20. Romeo Vitellion 17 May 2009 at 6:01 am

    Your flowchart needs clarification. Does it only apply to dick or does it extend to other exemplars of the “ick” class as well? Does it allow you to be a prick or a brick, for instance?

  21. Nargelon 17 May 2009 at 6:20 am

    Adrienne C @ 11

    Actually, I believe that was the Google folks.

  22. jayowenon 17 May 2009 at 7:43 am

    Scalzi, if the occasion ever warrants, would you toss out a “be a dick” thread like you do with your “self pimp” threads?

    You know some people say/do things so dickishly you have to let them know what a dick they are by speaking to them in their own dickish language.

  23. Stevenon 17 May 2009 at 7:45 am

    And what if Dick Lupoff or Dick Cheney, for instance, were to show up. Wouldn’t they, especially in the latter case, be allowed a certain amount of Dickishness?

  24. Samon 17 May 2009 at 8:06 am

    Your flowchart omits a working definition of “dick.” I apologize if that observation meets the unspoken definition. :-)

  25. Markoon 17 May 2009 at 8:21 am

    You’ve been out of a corporate office setting for too long.

    The “Not Allowed” bubble needs to be red. Also, you missed a perfect opportunity to present that flowchart in slide form, with cheesy transitions.

    With presentation skills like that, you’ll never be an overworked corporate drone for a generic global corporation, working eighty hours a week as a mid-level manager to fill a house you can’t afford with junk you don’t need.

  26. hugh57on 17 May 2009 at 8:34 am

    Rodney Graves @19: Thanks for that. I was wondering what triggered this, though I might have guessed it would be the Ethical Puzzler thread. I had stopped following that thread shortly after the average word count of the comments exceeded a paragraph or two. Maybe it’s my short attention span, but I find that when I have to work the scroll bar to read a single comment, my eyes glaze over and I must move on to something else.

    I don’t mind when Scalzi gets verbose. I mean, I could read whole books written by that guy. To the rest, I can only say: Less is more. Or, from Strunk & White: Omit needless words!

  27. nathanon 17 May 2009 at 8:41 am

    As a public service to those who feel restricted by John’s ban on “being a dick” by anyone other than himself, there’s a new site just for you.

    Dicks Anonymous

    An Equal Opportunity Dickish Community!

  28. John Scalzion 17 May 2009 at 8:43 am

    Rodney:

    Hey, now. Some of my best friends are named Richard.

    And while indeed some of the comments in the “Ethical Puzzler” thread were an immediate precipitant, it’s been happening elsewhere too. It was time to remind people generally.

  29. GregLondonon 17 May 2009 at 9:50 am

    now for something completely different

  30. Joyceon 17 May 2009 at 10:04 am

    I agree with Marko: you need a Powerpoint presentation for this.

  31. Jeff Hentoszon 17 May 2009 at 10:14 am

    Nathan @27: The site you link to is fraudulent, or at least seriously flawed. There is apparently no way to post anonymously, something key to being a dick in a comment thread.

  32. nathanon 17 May 2009 at 10:41 am

    Sorry Jeff, it’s fixed.

    Now go be dickish to your heart’s content.

  33. BC Woodson 17 May 2009 at 12:13 pm

    Just a minor point, in the interests of political correctness:

    There is no reason to assume that just because a person happens to have been turned into a giant sentient penis, there is no reason to assume that they are male. I think we can all agree that being transformed into a giant sentient penis happens to both genders with the same frequency.

  34. Jack Tingleon 17 May 2009 at 12:42 pm

    -10 points – Improperly drawn flowchart, no start point

  35. Heatheron 17 May 2009 at 1:40 pm

    BC @ 33,

    Thank you for that. Everybody thinks that being turned into a giant sentient penis is just a “man’s issue.” But it’s an equal opportunity issue, and I appreciate your willingness to treat it as such.

  36. Tumbleweedon 17 May 2009 at 1:53 pm

    Dude.

    Nice use of gradients. The web designer at work would be impressed. Rounded corners, too! That’s a very Web 2.0 flowchart ya got going there…

  37. BC Woodson 17 May 2009 at 2:04 pm

    @Heather

    You’re welcome, but really it’s my pleasure to speak up in defense of women afflicted with giant sentient penisism.

  38. Patrick M.on 17 May 2009 at 2:43 pm

    Hmm. Now I just have to filter am I being a dick or an ass. The flow chart seems to indicate that I am free to be a complete and utter ass.

  39. John Scalzion 17 May 2009 at 2:49 pm

    Patrick M:

    Just because the flow chart only specifies who is able to be a dick DOES NOT imply it’s okay to be an ass, or a jerk, or a douche, and so on.

  40. Eddie Clarkon 17 May 2009 at 3:26 pm

    This is disappointing. Its fun when people say “but Scalzi, YOU were a dick, why can’t I be one?” This explains it so clearly that they might stop doing that. And you say amusing things in those circumstances!

    Like I say, very disappointing.

  41. John Scalzion 17 May 2009 at 3:29 pm

    I rather suspect that people determined to be dicks here will still be determined after seeing the flowchart. That’s part of what makes them dicks.

  42. Xopheron 17 May 2009 at 3:58 pm

    Craig 7: …people go elsewhere because they get an ample supply of fresh dick closer to home.

    Speak fah yeseff, dahlin’.

    Oh wait, you meant…never mind.

    Steven 23: Dick Cheney is a full-time open throttle dick. He couldn’t stop being a dick long enough to comment acceptably on this site, is my bet.

    BC 33: There was a guy in my hometown whose nickname among my friends was “Carl, the human penis.” While he had a certain physical resemblance to the referenced bit of anatomy (when he wore a tan turtleneck it was impossible not to laugh), it was his behavior that got him the nick…and eventually landed him in jail IIRC.

    Oh, but you were talking about sentient penises. Not sure he qualified on that score.

  43. JimmyJoneson 17 May 2009 at 5:54 pm

    So in a way, those who are dicks here and not JS are simply trying to obtain dickdom. But in this case imitation is not viewed as flattery it seems.

    All this talk of dick makes one wonder, are we talking helmet heads or ant eaters?

  44. Patrick M.on 17 May 2009 at 6:38 pm

    Oh, right!

    So, who gets to be the ass? It seems only fair if you get to be the dick, someone else gets to be the ass.

  45. Xopheron 17 May 2009 at 6:46 pm

    Yes, Patrick, the two go together like hands joined, like the end and the way.

  46. Jay Won 17 May 2009 at 7:01 pm

    I’m sorry, but that flowchart is just hilarious. Nice work.

  47. Christianon 17 May 2009 at 7:33 pm

    The two “No” arrows don’t line up nicely on the vertical, on the upper right hand side of the chart. The two “Yes” words are also touching the descending lines (and lack symmetrical placement) and look rather unprofessional.

    Sincerely,

    Peter Dickington

  48. JimmyJoneson 17 May 2009 at 7:41 pm

    Yes, Patrick they certainly go together, more so for some people, not so much for others.

  49. Rodney Graveson 17 May 2009 at 9:55 pm

    JimmyJones @ 48,

    Watch out, you could be accused being a dick for that…

  50. Pam Adamson 17 May 2009 at 10:55 pm

    John,

    What about those bitter, sarcastic clones of yours? You may need another loop.

  51. John Scalzion 17 May 2009 at 11:01 pm

    No. They don’t own the site, you see.

  52. mythagoon 17 May 2009 at 11:43 pm

    What, no exceptions for that Scalvi guy?

  53. LBon 18 May 2009 at 12:03 am

    This flowchart post is going to be a very useful link later on when JS is having to deal with someone’s dickheaded behavior and/or douchebaggery.

    “[Insert dick/poster here], you are being a dick. Please see http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/05/17/because-flowcharts-make-everything-clearer/#comment-145886 and STFU. Thank you.”

    Very nice…

  54. Naton 18 May 2009 at 8:08 am

    Okay, I just had to explain the term “douche” to an Italian friend of mine. It was very, very awkward. And yes, I felt like a dick.

    Damn Anglos messing up French words.

  55. Another Lizon 18 May 2009 at 9:13 am

    Nargel @21: I think Google is “Don’t be evil.” WilW is definitely “Don’t be a dick.”

    It should be on a t-shirt.

  56. mjfgateson 18 May 2009 at 10:36 am

    When dicks are outlawed on the Internet, only outlaws.. .no, wait. That COMPLETELY doesn’t work.

  57. Fuzon 18 May 2009 at 11:33 am

    This clearly implies that if Scalzi changes his name he is no longer allowed to be a dick (on this site). Therefore, I believe we should found a “John Scalzi should change his name to Scalvi” movement.

  58. Bozo the Cloneon 18 May 2009 at 6:47 pm

    Good move there, John. You can never win a pissing contest with a dick unless you’re an even bigger dick.

  59. Another Lizon 18 May 2009 at 7:04 pm

    Bozo: Or have a bigger bladder.

  60. ytimynonaon 18 May 2009 at 10:38 pm

    Adrienne C said it first: Wil Wheaton says, “Don’t be a dick!”

  61. ytimynonaon 18 May 2009 at 10:38 pm

    And so does John Scalzi!

  62. moiocion 26 May 2009 at 6:34 pm

    re: Sentient Schlongs. Weren’t they playing in Seattle back in the early 90s?

Comments RSS

Leave a Reply (See: Comment Policy)