Oct 01 2009

Previously:
Ahead:

And Now, Your Chance To Win a Google Wave Invite

Published by John Scalzi at 1:52 pm

I promised a contest for one of my Google Wave invites, and here it is:

What number am I thinking of right now?

Yup, that’s it. Get it right, you win.

I’ll run this contest until, oh, 8pm eastern today.

In the event no one gets it, I’ll pick the number closest to it. If more than one person picks the number I’ll pick the first one to pick it.

To assure you that I will not just pick a number out of the air, I have entrusted Justine Larbalestier with the number for verification purposes. YOU CANNOT BRIBE HER. I already gave her one of my other GWave invites.

Note also that while I will process the winning e-mail for notification immediately, I make no promises on how long it will take to process (they are technically “nominations”). That’s up to Google.

Now: Tell me the number!

602 responses so far

602 Responses to “And Now, Your Chance To Win a Google Wave Invite”

  1. Alfredon 01 Oct 2009 at 1:56 pm

    2?

  2. Mikeon 01 Oct 2009 at 1:56 pm

    42

  3. a.a.johnsonon 01 Oct 2009 at 1:56 pm

    forty-two

  4. Matthew Dyeron 01 Oct 2009 at 1:56 pm

    Pi.

  5. Brandonon 01 Oct 2009 at 1:57 pm

    19

    Congratulations to whoever ends up winning as I’m pretty sure it won’t be me. ;)

  6. gavon 01 Oct 2009 at 1:57 pm

    42? The life universe and everything ;)

  7. thelittlefluffycaton 01 Oct 2009 at 1:57 pm

    42, because it’s the answer to everything.

  8. John Scotton 01 Oct 2009 at 1:57 pm

    37

  9. VTon 01 Oct 2009 at 1:57 pm

    33.

  10. mpomyon 01 Oct 2009 at 1:57 pm

    Pi – 3.14159265 etc.

  11. Jameson 01 Oct 2009 at 1:57 pm

    42

  12. Christopheron 01 Oct 2009 at 1:57 pm

    Pi

  13. Shawn Powerson 01 Oct 2009 at 1:57 pm

    8675309 ?

  14. mpomyon 01 Oct 2009 at 1:57 pm

    Can we vote more than once?

  15. Steve Thornon 01 Oct 2009 at 1:57 pm

    1

  16. Barbaraon 01 Oct 2009 at 1:57 pm

    10 to the 100th power!

  17. jman077on 01 Oct 2009 at 1:58 pm

    87

  18. TheCosmicKahunaon 01 Oct 2009 at 1:58 pm

    1,134!

  19. BonnieBelleon 01 Oct 2009 at 1:58 pm

    29

  20. Randy Bradakison 01 Oct 2009 at 1:58 pm

    41
    That is the number.

  21. Leahon 01 Oct 2009 at 1:58 pm

    75

  22. Jameson 01 Oct 2009 at 1:58 pm

    OK, wow. there were zero comments and in the time it took me to type “42″ I ended 11th in line.

  23. Adam Lipkinon 01 Oct 2009 at 1:58 pm

    48

  24. rowanon 01 Oct 2009 at 1:58 pm

    666 innit? :)

  25. mpomyon 01 Oct 2009 at 1:58 pm

    Why did I click the subscribe button?!?

  26. Adrienne Travison 01 Oct 2009 at 1:58 pm

    943!

  27. overdesignedon 01 Oct 2009 at 1:58 pm

    I’m going with the my old ‘guess the number’ standby, fourteen (14).

  28. Sarah M.on 01 Oct 2009 at 1:58 pm

    8675309

  29. Pamala Knighton 01 Oct 2009 at 1:59 pm

    My guess is 17.

  30. Chrison 01 Oct 2009 at 1:59 pm

    3.14159…

  31. Jae Walkeron 01 Oct 2009 at 1:59 pm

    I have to go with 42. Even if I’m wrong, it seems so appropriate.

  32. tedon 01 Oct 2009 at 1:59 pm

    42

  33. Kay Hanleyon 01 Oct 2009 at 1:59 pm

    I don’t even know what Google Wave is (cuz i haven’t googled it) but I know that I want it.

    You are thinking of the #7.

  34. Marko Klooson 01 Oct 2009 at 1:59 pm

    I bet it’s one of those imaginary numbers, like eleventeen or thirty-twelve.

  35. Christopheron 01 Oct 2009 at 1:59 pm

    Someone guessed Pi before me, therefore I change my guess to Phi (1.61803399).

  36. Prestonon 01 Oct 2009 at 1:59 pm

    842.1

    Why are so many of you assuming it’s between 1 and 100? :p

  37. Sam Cousinson 01 Oct 2009 at 1:59 pm

    37

  38. John Sheaon 01 Oct 2009 at 1:59 pm

    1

  39. Sarahon 01 Oct 2009 at 1:59 pm

    23.

    (yes, I read too much Wilson)

  40. SonomaLasson 01 Oct 2009 at 1:59 pm

    666

  41. Chris Salteron 01 Oct 2009 at 1:59 pm

    Euler’s number

  42. Karianneon 01 Oct 2009 at 1:59 pm

    43!

  43. Erikon 01 Oct 2009 at 1:59 pm

    37

  44. eric son 01 Oct 2009 at 1:59 pm

    24

  45. Sinistraon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:00 pm

    What the hey. I pick 52.

    Yes, I know that’s ten too many.

  46. Becca Stareyeson 01 Oct 2009 at 2:00 pm

    Well, why not…

    pi/π

    That’s a number, right?

  47. pmbukoon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:00 pm

    Eleventy seven.

  48. patrickon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:00 pm

    42

  49. wygiton 01 Oct 2009 at 2:00 pm

    11

  50. Aaron Mavrinacon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:00 pm

    143

  51. Jae Walkeron 01 Oct 2009 at 2:00 pm

    Oh, heck – for some reason the comments didn’t come up when I looked (before I posted) and I see someone else has 42. May I switch to 55? (My age as of yesterday…)

  52. Ru'ethaon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:00 pm

    1701

  53. Sarah M.on 01 Oct 2009 at 2:00 pm

    @shawn
    I swear your response wasn’t there when I started to post. I would say something about great minds, but I’m not sure that being stuck on 80s rock makes us great.

  54. Brian Gon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:00 pm

    42! (Does the ! help?) I’m hoping so. Can’t wait to run my car on AAA batteries! Plus my cat looks flat.

  55. C. Scott Kippenon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:00 pm

    32

  56. WizarDruon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:01 pm

    Dare I say it? Googol.

  57. Jennifer Pon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:01 pm

    9,771

  58. Josh W.on 01 Oct 2009 at 2:01 pm

    3.

  59. Chris Salteron 01 Oct 2009 at 2:01 pm

    To clarify, the specific euler’s number I was thinking of is (pulling from Wikipedia)…

    2.71828 18284 59045 23536…

    (Sorry for the irrelevant comment.)

  60. EmmyCeeon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:01 pm

    342!

  61. Steve Burnapon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:01 pm

    1 Googol. (i.e. 10^100)

  62. Colenon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:01 pm

    104

  63. Larryon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:01 pm

    4610

  64. Barstool Babeon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:01 pm

    98,138

  65. mpomyon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:01 pm

    Number nine, number nine

  66. kemayoon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:01 pm

    69, dude! (*air-guitar*)

  67. Iceangelon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:02 pm

    42 :)

  68. Wuss912on 01 Oct 2009 at 2:02 pm

    57

  69. Arkemon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:02 pm

    A Googol

    i.e. 10^100
    10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

  70. Vernonon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:02 pm

    11

  71. Pablo Defendinion 01 Oct 2009 at 2:02 pm

    Seven. Oh please let it be seven.

  72. Mark "Klowner" Riedeselon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:02 pm

    9!

  73. A.M.on 01 Oct 2009 at 2:02 pm

    5

  74. James Stoweon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:03 pm

    Zero

  75. Kyle Maxwellon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:03 pm

    e (2.718…)

  76. gottacookon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:03 pm

    4.4 million (age, in years, of Ardipithecus ramidus, or “Ardi”)

  77. Francis Heaneyon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:03 pm

    16,432

  78. Peteron 01 Oct 2009 at 2:03 pm

    67

  79. Shemp Duchampon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:03 pm

    Square root of -1?

  80. Jonathan Vaughton 01 Oct 2009 at 2:03 pm

    OK, I’ll bite…

    1984

  81. Matton 01 Oct 2009 at 2:03 pm

    Zero

  82. Scouton 01 Oct 2009 at 2:03 pm

    a googol

  83. Alon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:03 pm

    7 =D

  84. Arkemon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:04 pm

    Damn, between opening the page and finding somewhere that had a googol written down (so I could copy paste it in) 67 comments got posted including someone else who picked 10^100, guess that makes me not the winner :)

  85. Brendaon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:04 pm

    Avogadro’s Number: 6.0221415 × 10 ^ -23

  86. Butch Howardon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:04 pm

    e

  87. Patrickon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:04 pm

    47

  88. michael pon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:04 pm

    311 (the number of pages in the copy of OMW sitting on my desk right now)

  89. Bill Leisneron 01 Oct 2009 at 2:04 pm

    negative 4.

  90. Markon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:04 pm

    103

  91. glennon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:04 pm

    I’d guess your Daughter Athena’s age.

    or

    more then 2….

  92. Jeanneon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:04 pm

    6382

  93. a different philon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:04 pm

    e (2.71828183…)

  94. Alternative Eric S.on 01 Oct 2009 at 2:05 pm

    13

  95. Andrew Hackardon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:05 pm

    45308

  96. Rich H.on 01 Oct 2009 at 2:05 pm

    88 (as in 88mph).

  97. Guson 01 Oct 2009 at 2:05 pm

    16843 random guess :)

  98. Shawn Powerson 01 Oct 2009 at 2:05 pm

    @sarah #52 — you’re right, it wasn’t there at first. I had to go “Back in Time” Huey Lewis style to post before you.

    Yeah, we’re a bit lame I guess… ;)

  99. Brian Con 01 Oct 2009 at 2:05 pm

    462

  100. Dawn Kuczwaraon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:05 pm

    i

  101. Gordon McGregoron 01 Oct 2009 at 2:05 pm

    5318008

  102. BrandGon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:05 pm

    One billion (1,000,000,000)

  103. Felipe Trevelinon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:05 pm

    13

  104. Tony Nolandon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:05 pm

    I’m going to guess…

    one googol.

  105. Steve Burnapon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:06 pm

    Ok, if it is a actually a Googol, I am going to be pissed off for missing by less than a minute!

  106. Gregoryon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:06 pm

    2701

    The product of two primes 37 and the digit reversal of it: 73. That is, 37*73=2701; Made so famous in N.S.’s Cryptonomicon.

  107. Allisonon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:07 pm

    47. Go Pomona!

  108. Nullon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:07 pm

    500

  109. Komaváryon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:07 pm

    -51

  110. matt smithon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:07 pm

    00000000

  111. Irene Delseon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:07 pm

    A googolplex!

    10^(10^100)

    (What, too obvious? Sigh.)

  112. Wendyon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:08 pm

    38. No idea why.

  113. Brian Johnsonon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:08 pm

    Eleven.

  114. CODon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:08 pm

    75

  115. Jagginson 01 Oct 2009 at 2:08 pm

    333! (not the factorial…)

  116. Jackon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:08 pm

    Sqrt(-1)!

    ! Indicates emphasis, not factorial, by the way.

  117. Brian Gon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:08 pm

    I’m beginning to think there might be more than 4 or 5 us following Scalzi… Glad I didn’t check the follow-up comments box!

  118. Billon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:09 pm

    If my calculations are correct, the answer is:

    834

  119. Nickon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:10 pm

    Oh, oh, it’s 168! It is, isn’t it?

  120. lysanderon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:10 pm

    Sixty-four.

  121. Jon Hansenon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:10 pm

    Negative infinity minus one.

  122. overdesignedon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:10 pm

    @ 114: I did and I immediately regretted my decision.

  123. Marybethon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:10 pm

    37?

  124. lucypon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:10 pm

    100109

  125. Lauren Uroffon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:10 pm

    10, because that’s how old Athena is.

  126. Dawn Kuczwaraon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:11 pm

    try that again…

    i

  127. Lanna Lee Maheux-Quinnon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:11 pm

    Rational? Integer? Negative or positive?

    8

    (please,please,please,please,please pick me!)

  128. Mitchon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:11 pm

    38

  129. Brendaon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:11 pm

    And I’m an idiot. Avogadro’s number, correctly noted: 6.022 x 10 ^ 23. Minus sign FAIL.

  130. DaveDon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:12 pm

    1337

    Maybe. Well… only if you’re a huge geek. In which case we both kinda lose.

  131. Josh Baleson 01 Oct 2009 at 2:12 pm

    11,477.

  132. Ghlaghgheeon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:12 pm

    20, because that is as high as you can count. And even that requires taking off socks.

  133. David murphyon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:12 pm

    Zero :)

  134. Jonathanon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:13 pm

    7

  135. Hyrumon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:13 pm

    661 because Google is the beast and 666 is too obvious.

  136. Elon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:13 pm

    1999

  137. Jennieon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:13 pm

    1927

  138. Jeff Zugaleon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:13 pm

    1701

  139. Miaon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:14 pm

    73

  140. Hanson 01 Oct 2009 at 2:14 pm

    The number i (as in i squared = -1)

  141. pixelmeowon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:14 pm

    42

  142. GeekBostonon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:15 pm

    24601 – For all the Les Miserables fans out there!

  143. strugglingwriteron 01 Oct 2009 at 2:15 pm

    3. It’s a magic number.

  144. KJKaton 01 Oct 2009 at 2:15 pm

    47?

  145. DHudsonon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:16 pm

    247

  146. Jayon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:16 pm

    472

  147. jpon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:16 pm

    711

    Who needs the Kwik-E-Mart?

  148. Jankaon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:16 pm

    172

  149. Emilyon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:16 pm

    815

  150. J.W.on 01 Oct 2009 at 2:17 pm

    36

  151. pcomeauon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:17 pm

    10

  152. Brianon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:17 pm

    6.02 x 10^23

  153. Dave Klechaon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:17 pm

    871

    Sorry, initially sent it by e-mail.

  154. The Mad Carpenteron 01 Oct 2009 at 2:17 pm

    Google Wave in Binary is 0100011101101111011011110110011101101100011001010010000001010111011000010111011001100101.

    That’s the number you’re thinking of.

  155. Andrewon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:17 pm

    3791

  156. Grá Linnaeaon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:18 pm

    69?

  157. iainon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:18 pm

    2 minus 3 = negative fun.

  158. Lawcomicon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:19 pm

    1001

  159. Diondi Tanon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:19 pm

    0?

  160. Jeffon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:19 pm

    137. The cosmic number..ooooOOOOOooh!

  161. Timon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:20 pm

    299,792,458 (the speed of light).

  162. reimerpdxon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:20 pm

    -42

  163. Jenneon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:20 pm

    2000?

  164. Trippon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:20 pm

    867-5309

  165. Hughon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:20 pm

    43

  166. Charleson 01 Oct 2009 at 2:21 pm

    71

    (If you must know why, research the late George Carlin for the answer)

  167. Jpmrockon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:21 pm

    100

  168. Terryon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:21 pm

    23

  169. Eric Schneideron 01 Oct 2009 at 2:21 pm

    40

    :>

  170. Joergon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:21 pm

    1344

  171. Mykrofton 01 Oct 2009 at 2:21 pm

    I’m going to guess i. Or j if you’re an EE.

  172. Jenetton 01 Oct 2009 at 2:21 pm

    63 (only because it’s my favorite number)

  173. Michael OKeefeon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:22 pm

    e to the pi minus pi

  174. Konekoon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:22 pm

    17.

  175. Carlo Zottmannon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:22 pm

    1. Thanks for the invite!

    Everybody else, go home. We have a winner. *cough*

  176. just Danielon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:22 pm

    The Feigenbaum constant. Always one of my favourites. 4.6692016091029….

  177. Todd Wileyon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:22 pm

    i. As in the Sq Rt of -1.

  178. Jason Dayon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:22 pm

    40

  179. Jayon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:22 pm

    going with 0.

  180. Brian Mon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:22 pm

    296

  181. clemRIPon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:22 pm

    number 7

  182. Jeffrey Beumelon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:23 pm

    1337

  183. Vinceon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:23 pm

    0
    even though it isn’t technically a number

  184. Kennethon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:23 pm

    1652

  185. Peron 01 Oct 2009 at 2:23 pm

    517

  186. emeraldciteon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:23 pm

    10

  187. Karen Ron 01 Oct 2009 at 2:24 pm

    1218

  188. Nickon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:24 pm

    24601

  189. notTHATcheron 01 Oct 2009 at 2:25 pm

    one.

  190. EdFon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:25 pm

    2009

  191. Comrade Matton 01 Oct 2009 at 2:25 pm

    10109

  192. Feliciaon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:25 pm

    27

  193. Longwingon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:26 pm

    I’m going to go with googolplex. One with one hundred zeros behind it. Probably not the answer, but it had to be mentioned in the thread someplace.

  194. cmwnycon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:26 pm

    21

  195. James Scherberon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:27 pm

    -100

  196. SirTomsteron 01 Oct 2009 at 2:27 pm

    1970 since that was the year I was presented to this world.

  197. Tonyaon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:27 pm

    525

  198. Krison 01 Oct 2009 at 2:27 pm

    0xDEADBEEF

  199. Chuckon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:27 pm

    Your phone number.

  200. pixelmeowon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:27 pm

    woops, I was’t copying, I swear… okay, disregard my “42″.

    make it… um… (searches above) (damn, someone took the golden ratio!)

    53 (just popped into my head)

  201. vsumneron 01 Oct 2009 at 2:27 pm

    42 – The Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  202. Trevon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:27 pm

    238

  203. PixelFishon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:28 pm

    144

  204. Tonyaon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:28 pm

    3.14159265

  205. micahon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:28 pm

    26, under the “it’s too unremarkable to have been guessed already” theory.

  206. Longwingon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:29 pm

    @ Irene Delse (108) – You beat me to it! Curses, foiled again!

  207. Neil Don 01 Oct 2009 at 2:29 pm

    1968

  208. cathyon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:30 pm

    11

  209. thalinon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:30 pm

    I know I’m wrong, but I really really really want an invite so I’m trying anyway.

    0×476F6F676C652057617656
    Google Wave in hex bytes.

  210. Johnon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:31 pm

    2005

  211. Arthur Conan Smithon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:31 pm

    97.

  212. JimFon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:31 pm

    PI since I’m feeling very circular today.

    3.14159 26535 89793 23846 26433 83279 50288 41971 69399 37510

  213. Justin Stanleyon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:31 pm

  214. David M.on 01 Oct 2009 at 2:32 pm

    42

  215. Lauren Beukeson 01 Oct 2009 at 2:32 pm

    Twelfty.

  216. Tony Milleron 01 Oct 2009 at 2:32 pm

    1492

  217. NarcoSleepyon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:32 pm

    Bacon. What did I win again?

  218. Jayowenon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:32 pm

    1138

  219. josephon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:33 pm

    golden ratio=1.6180339887…

  220. John Rea-Hedrickon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:33 pm

    45

  221. Jon Freestoneon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:33 pm

    1123581321

  222. Jasonon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:34 pm

    75

  223. Deson 01 Oct 2009 at 2:34 pm

    - 273,15

  224. Joe M.on 01 Oct 2009 at 2:35 pm

    79

  225. William Seligmanon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:35 pm

    73

  226. Mikeon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:35 pm

    32,767

  227. Austinon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:35 pm

    I bet you are not thinking it but Planck’s constant:
    6.626068 × 10-34 m2 kg / s

  228. danon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:36 pm

    12

  229. Leftyon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:36 pm

    Avogadro’s Number, 6.02×10^23

  230. Dan R.on 01 Oct 2009 at 2:36 pm

    278.

  231. chaoson 01 Oct 2009 at 2:36 pm

    1.803 x 10^12

  232. Jay Garmonon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:37 pm

    Schadenfreude Pi
    3.1415-nein!

  233. Andréson 01 Oct 2009 at 2:37 pm

    1

  234. tolloon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:38 pm

    10452

  235. mensleyon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:38 pm

    Weird. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a thread here accumulate responses as fast as this one is.

    227, which is how many responses are up so far.

  236. KingOfSleepon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:38 pm

    Numberwang.

  237. Dave Hon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:38 pm

    372

  238. David Skyon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:39 pm

    312

  239. Steveon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:39 pm

    2310

  240. stoolpigeonon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:39 pm

    3

  241. Octopusgrabbuson 01 Oct 2009 at 2:40 pm

    782

  242. Staceyon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:40 pm

    769

  243. Joe Kavanaghon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:41 pm

    6
    The number of novels you’ve had out so far
    -Joe

  244. J.D.on 01 Oct 2009 at 2:42 pm

    3

  245. Keithon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:42 pm

    11

  246. boomeron 01 Oct 2009 at 2:42 pm

    7

  247. Crashon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:42 pm

    42

  248. Ken Marableon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:42 pm

    It looks like most of the unique and interesting choices are taken, so I’ll go with 34. Don’t think I’ve seen that one yet.

  249. jenon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:43 pm

    13,000

  250. Jonon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:43 pm

    112

  251. Tomon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:43 pm

    0

  252. Paulon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:44 pm

    12345

  253. Rabid Androidon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:44 pm

    3.14?

  254. Andréson 01 Oct 2009 at 2:44 pm

    27

  255. Tomon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:44 pm

    @195 – Kris – Nice!

  256. benon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:45 pm

    500513

  257. Rabid Androidon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:45 pm

    Doh! You guys are fast..
    1024

    Rabid

  258. Zacon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:46 pm

    525,600
    Five hundred twenty-five thousand six hundred minutes…

  259. Melon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:46 pm

    99

  260. Zon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:47 pm

    11
    As in 11 years of Whatever.
    http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/09/13/11-years/

  261. AndyDeckon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:47 pm

    46645, the SMS code for GOOGL

  262. Another Lizon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:47 pm

    You = silly.

    24601.

  263. Peter Heltzeron 01 Oct 2009 at 2:47 pm

    01000111011011110110111101100111011011000110010100100000010101110110000101110110
    01100101

  264. Hughon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:48 pm

    51069

  265. Deanna Hoakon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:48 pm

    1,396,008

  266. Another Lizon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:48 pm

    Ha, teach me not to search first. Well, there are only so many… Huh… infinity? (“What, zero’s a percent.”)

  267. neethon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:49 pm

    googol

  268. wrabbiton 01 Oct 2009 at 2:50 pm

    The Golden Ratio, 1.618

  269. Rich G.on 01 Oct 2009 at 2:50 pm

    How about 49?

  270. nickon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:51 pm

    7,168

  271. Mykeon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:51 pm

    9283

  272. Tim Arnoldon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:52 pm

    52

  273. pjowens75on 01 Oct 2009 at 2:52 pm

    4,736

  274. Jedidiahon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:53 pm

    Well, since e, phi, and Planck’s constant are already taken:

    12345

  275. Brianon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:53 pm

    8,202,008

    I feel like we’re playing the Price is Right.

  276. Pam Adamson 01 Oct 2009 at 2:53 pm

    16574146 ( derived by pressing randomly on number pad)

  277. pupdogon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:54 pm

    -11

  278. John Herberton 01 Oct 2009 at 2:55 pm

    A longshot, but how about googolplex?

  279. GregLondonon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:56 pm

    green.

  280. Seanon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:57 pm

    1423

  281. Peripatetic Entrepreneuron 01 Oct 2009 at 2:57 pm

    777

  282. Bryanon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:58 pm

    417

  283. Naomion 01 Oct 2009 at 2:58 pm

    1,284,413

  284. Ssonicblueon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:58 pm

    7,240

    Seven thousand, two hundred and forty.

  285. John Kerron 01 Oct 2009 at 2:58 pm

    I think it is a GOOGOLPLEX, or ten to the power of a googol.

  286. beowuffon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:59 pm

    1 Googolplex

    or…

    10^10^100.

  287. Dave Hon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:59 pm

    n = c / pi ^ 2 + i (10^100) / 42 ^ e

    I think that pretty well covers all the pop culture constants, doesn’t it?

    Yeah, yeah, I know – pi isn’t squared, it’s round.

  288. MikeTon 01 Oct 2009 at 2:59 pm

    723

  289. beowuffon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:00 pm

    DANG IT! By the time I wrote that, it went from no googolplexes to several before my post… Man this is filling up fast!

  290. Bill Hon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:00 pm

    8

  291. Kaion 01 Oct 2009 at 3:00 pm

    444!

  292. MJBUtahon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:00 pm

    742

  293. Benedict Leighon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:01 pm

    341

  294. mythouson 01 Oct 2009 at 3:02 pm

    77 why not.

    though I was tempted to throw in a Fibonacci sequence (good thing I didn’t, had to use google to find the spelling.

  295. TransDutchon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:03 pm

    Three people have already guessed Valjean’s first prison number. (He did have a second one, but it only appears in the book, and I doubt Scalzi is that much of a Les Miz geek.)

    No one has guessed the temperature at which paper catches fire (Fahrenheit or Celsius) — and we’re in the middle of Banned Books week, geesh.

    I’m not guessing either of those numbers, as I said in the other thread, I already have been nominated. I’m just saying I’m disappointed.

  296. Pendrifton 01 Oct 2009 at 3:04 pm

    911

  297. mythouson 01 Oct 2009 at 3:04 pm

    NOOOOO!!! john, john please let me delete the comment. y’see I’m a m…. yeah a member of the ultra secret Fibonacci group.

    and they’ll take my secret decoder ring away.

  298. Joshon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:05 pm

    I’m gonna go with 8680, Bob.

  299. MattBon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:06 pm

    152

  300. jtlarousseon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:06 pm

    Blue. No! Red!

  301. furicleon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:07 pm

    9.10

  302. Sheckyon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:07 pm

    e

  303. TKayon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:07 pm

    Because you’re on your way to VP XIII soon, I’m going to guess 13.

  304. Carmenon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:08 pm

    75, the age John Perry joins the army.

  305. Jordan Lappon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:08 pm

    A googol?

  306. Kristenon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:08 pm

    2,386!

  307. Kit Smithon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:09 pm

    176,348,993.625

  308. Ed Greaveson 01 Oct 2009 at 3:09 pm

    47

  309. TKayon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:09 pm

    Aw, hell, never mind–two people in front of me picked 13! That’s what I get for NOT searching first…

  310. Mark Horningon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:09 pm

    Man Pi, e, Zero and 42 got taken quickly. I’m going to go with i (square root of negitive 1)

  311. Donnieon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:10 pm

    867-5309

  312. Erikoon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:10 pm

    1 googol
    = 10100
    = 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

  313. Kevin Hon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:11 pm

    65

  314. John Coxenon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:12 pm

    235

  315. Timon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:12 pm

    5.39124(27) x 10^-44

  316. Gomion 01 Oct 2009 at 3:12 pm

    482

  317. Kelly Nortonon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:13 pm

    429.. that’s the random number that Roboform generated for me.

  318. gston 01 Oct 2009 at 3:13 pm

    1000

  319. Magnus Edlundon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:13 pm

    97,542,988.56

  320. Justinon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:14 pm

    100109

  321. Ben Schillingon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:14 pm

    i
    (square root of negative one)

  322. Anthony Cunninghamon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:14 pm

    32768

  323. oooooopson 01 Oct 2009 at 3:14 pm

    73

  324. azandeon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:15 pm

    7

  325. Joe Hasson 01 Oct 2009 at 3:16 pm

    318

  326. Dave Bon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:16 pm

    ħ

  327. Jordanon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:16 pm

    How has no one guessed 256 yet?

    256

  328. zakuron 01 Oct 2009 at 3:17 pm

    40

  329. writtenwyrddon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:17 pm

    666!

  330. Scotton 01 Oct 2009 at 3:17 pm

    412

  331. turtlesongon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:17 pm

    has anyone guessed a wheaton yet?

  332. Brianon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:18 pm

    357

    Scalzi transliterated into Hebrew and assigned a numerical value according to the principals of gematria.

  333. KevinQon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:18 pm

    3985

    K

  334. Mustafaon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:18 pm

    Goggle or Google

  335. Daveon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:19 pm

    1969

  336. Louiseon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:20 pm

    5717

  337. Bradon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:21 pm

    712

  338. Meredithon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:21 pm

    9.52 x 10^(-4)

  339. Tse Moanaon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:22 pm

    731

  340. samrobbon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:23 pm

    c (299,792,458 m/s, or so says Google).

  341. Matton 01 Oct 2009 at 3:23 pm

    86

  342. Roger E.on 01 Oct 2009 at 3:24 pm

    -6

  343. MO'Bon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:24 pm

    3.14

  344. MO'Bon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:25 pm

    The square root of -1

  345. AlanMon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:25 pm

    Graham’s Number. This number is so big that it can’t be written in standard scientific notation. You can’t even write down the number of digits it has in scientific notation. Heck, you can’t write down the number that states the number of digits of the number that states the number of digits of Graham’s Number in scientific notation.

    As a side note, Graham’s Number is the upper bound in a particular combinatorial proof. The current lower bound is 11 (recently improved from 6, which isn’t really that much of an improvement if you think about it).

  346. Beckyon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:25 pm

    973

  347. samrobbon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:25 pm

    451 (to keep TransDutch happy)

  348. toxicfuron 01 Oct 2009 at 3:26 pm

    330

  349. John Giottaon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:26 pm

    The number you’re thinking about then or now? Or… now? What about later; after you’ve read this? 3!!! Just then you thought of the number 3. Okay, yes, I did force you to think 3… damn I did it again, sorry. I’ll stop making you think of 3, from now on I’ll only focus on the number 41. You’re thinking about the number 41. Ah ha! I was right, you are thinking of 41 just then. Even now, you’re thinking of 41. After this clearly distracting sentence you think of the number 41! 41, 41, 41. Okay, now you’re reflecting on how I made you think of the number 3, but like I said we’re done with the 3, so stop thinking about it… I’m confused now. I know, I clearly made you think of the number 3 and the number 41, but what will you ultimately think of? Hell, it could be the number 159 and I’ll lose because it wasn’t 159 and some other number like 77. No, I’ve decided; you thought of 41. However, to increase my chances I foresee you thought of 3, 41, 3 (again), 77, 159, and then 41 within the last 90 seconds.

    Did I win?

  350. Scotton 01 Oct 2009 at 3:26 pm

    8,675,309!

  351. Rob Thorntonon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:29 pm

    50

  352. CamTurneron 01 Oct 2009 at 3:29 pm

    1001

  353. Richard Crawfordon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:30 pm

    83

  354. Janon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:30 pm

    4863

  355. Derryl Murphyon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:30 pm

    10.

  356. CamTurneron 01 Oct 2009 at 3:31 pm

    err make that 1001.1. Didn’t realize someone already have 1001.

  357. Peter Hagelundon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:31 pm

    Assuming A=1, B=2, C=3, etc. Bacon spells out 2+1+3+15+14=35.

    …so: 35!

  358. Snickerson 01 Oct 2009 at 3:32 pm

    56!

  359. Timon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:32 pm

    9-4-1998 date Google was incorporated

  360. NAon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:34 pm

    3

  361. Chrison 01 Oct 2009 at 3:35 pm

    12764

  362. Hughon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:36 pm

    792

  363. PaulBon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:37 pm

    As uttered by Bill S. Preston, Esquire and Ted Theodore Logan; “69 dude!”.

    But I’ll disqualify myself John as I am already on the Gwave.

  364. Chukon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:37 pm

    647.5, since no one else has guessed that yet.

  365. Loganon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:37 pm

    1001

  366. Kirbyon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:38 pm

    -1678

  367. Christianon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:38 pm

    1

  368. Michaelon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:38 pm

    1984

  369. Chrison 01 Oct 2009 at 3:39 pm

    6

  370. georg pattersonon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:41 pm

    206

  371. ForMatton 01 Oct 2009 at 3:41 pm

    1.

    One is the loneliest number.

  372. The Pathetic Earthlingon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:42 pm

    I’ll go with 159. (I see that #342 has already mentioned it, but for some reason it seems to be the last number my son recognizes before he gets to “google” and “googleplex”)

  373. More cowbell!on 01 Oct 2009 at 3:42 pm

    767

  374. Bobon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:43 pm

    54!

  375. Justin Danielon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:44 pm

    738

  376. TioChanon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:45 pm

    24

  377. ella144on 01 Oct 2009 at 3:45 pm

    7

  378. Seannibalon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:47 pm

    42007

  379. steveon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:50 pm

    Pi

  380. Catherine Shafferon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:50 pm

    11

  381. steveon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:50 pm

    e

  382. CV Rickon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:51 pm

    44

    Because it’s a perfectly fine number.

  383. steveon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:51 pm

    i

  384. Hal Son 01 Oct 2009 at 3:52 pm

    I can’t believe Matt B posted my number first, “152″. Who the Hell picks 152 except for me? OK, Matt B, my number is now 153. Suck on that!

  385. Michael S.on 01 Oct 2009 at 3:52 pm

    513

  386. steveon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:52 pm

    negative infinity

  387. Noahon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:52 pm

    1975

  388. Ericon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:52 pm

    19

  389. steveon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:53 pm

    1234

  390. David Alton Doddon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:53 pm

    365.25

  391. Adrienneon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:53 pm

    47.

  392. patrickon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:53 pm

    31

  393. matxon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:55 pm

    347
    I was going to do 247, but someone else got that. Hudson, that wave was gonna be *mine*.

  394. Connor Andersonon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:55 pm

    6.0221415 × 1023

  395. Connor Andersonon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:56 pm

    Bah, that’s supposed to be 6.0221415 x 10^23

  396. Andrewon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:56 pm

    876

  397. Andrea Phillipson 01 Oct 2009 at 3:56 pm

    Oooh! Oooh! 378!

  398. Thomason 01 Oct 2009 at 3:56 pm

    19+69i

    Because your complex 40 year old guy (and 1969 was taken).

  399. Nateon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:56 pm

    91

  400. WendyB_09on 01 Oct 2009 at 3:57 pm

    153

  401. Andrew Fon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:57 pm

    59.
    Don’t know why… just leapt into my head!

  402. Merbraton 01 Oct 2009 at 3:58 pm

    um… 512

  403. emittimeon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:58 pm

    Elventy-billion

  404. Phillip J. Birminghamon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:58 pm

    one thousand and one

  405. Carrieon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:59 pm

    Seven-hundred-eighty-seven.

  406. Steve Simmonson 01 Oct 2009 at 3:59 pm

    e ^ ( i * pi )

  407. Desireeon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:59 pm

    Since 42 is taken, I’ll double that guess, and make my guess 84.

  408. Pennon 01 Oct 2009 at 3:59 pm

    Eleventy-one.

  409. Dennis Pascualon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:00 pm

    1987

  410. spion 01 Oct 2009 at 4:01 pm

    516

  411. Steve Sundeenon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:01 pm

    33

  412. Dirty Wizard Hunteron 01 Oct 2009 at 4:03 pm

    “You are coming through in waves,”
    from Pink Floyd’s Comfortably Numb is 6:54,
    therefore, I’m going with 654.
    PS I’m listening to it now . . .

  413. Willon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:04 pm

    17

  414. Nicole S.on 01 Oct 2009 at 4:05 pm

    2666

  415. Michael S.on 01 Oct 2009 at 4:05 pm

    10-2-2009, on second thought, for the premiere of SG-U that our esteemed host might just have some small interest in…..

  416. TheMadLibrarianon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:07 pm

    8. No reason, just 8.

  417. S Andrew Swannon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:07 pm

    Well since every mundane possibility has been guessed so far, I’ll go with Aleph-One: the cardinality of the set of all countable ordinal numbers. (This is opposed to the smaller infinity Aleph-Null the cardinality of the set of all natural numbers, which could be construed as taken by the earlier guess at “infinity.”)

  418. S Andrew Swannon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:08 pm

    meant, “every mundane possibility I had happened to think of”

  419. Dirty Wizard Hunteron 01 Oct 2009 at 4:10 pm

    Just in case, here’s my main email . . .
    654
    Thanks,
    DWH

  420. Kation 01 Oct 2009 at 4:11 pm

    6765, the 20th number in the Fibonacci sequence.

  421. Tim Boergeron 01 Oct 2009 at 4:12 pm

    87. No idea why.

  422. TVon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:12 pm

    I think it is 8,847,192 give or take 3.

  423. ellindigoon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:12 pm

    55

  424. Patrick A.on 01 Oct 2009 at 4:16 pm

    i (the square root of -1)

  425. Paulon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:16 pm

    42 was obviously your first choice, but that would be too easy, wouldn’t it?

    On the other hand, if you wanted people to think it would be too easy, you’d pick it, just to throw us off.

    On the other hand, we know how sneaky you are, and we’d think you’d NOT pick it because you might pick it just to throw us off.

    On the other hand, I’m confusing myself with all these hands, so I’m just going to pick 967.

  426. Mon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:18 pm

    100,000 just like the amount of google invites they released :-)

  427. Scott Forbeson 01 Oct 2009 at 4:18 pm

    415 guesses and no one has said “googol” yet?

  428. Scott Forbeson 01 Oct 2009 at 4:20 pm

    Oh, wait, @305 guessed that. I pick the highest prime number, then.

  429. Austinon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:20 pm

    Ooooo maybe 100,000, the number of people the new round of invites went to.

  430. Peter Son 01 Oct 2009 at 4:20 pm

    4012

  431. Dennison 01 Oct 2009 at 4:20 pm

    43 seems random enough.

  432. Austinon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:20 pm

    Also 420, the number I posted my last post and the time I posted!

  433. Perpetual Beginneron 01 Oct 2009 at 4:21 pm

    1127

  434. Anujon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:22 pm

    3720 (to 1!) :)

  435. JamesDon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:22 pm

    i (as in the square root of negative 1)
    It totally makes sense because the number is in your head, which makes it imaginary…. yeah, totally makes sense… right?

    My second guess (are we allowed 2? oh well) would be 8, because that’s how many invites you get and whatnot

  436. Jonon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:24 pm

    91

  437. Dave Ruddellon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:24 pm

    92

  438. Arloon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:24 pm

    186,000

  439. Queegmireon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:26 pm

    1764

  440. persephonesunseton 01 Oct 2009 at 4:26 pm

    the number.

  441. Ewanon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:27 pm

    524678.

  442. Atarukunon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:29 pm

    10,532

  443. Darth Paradoxon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:31 pm

    432.

  444. Persiaon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:32 pm

    42,000,000, ’cause no one else has guessed it yet.

  445. Richon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:32 pm

    #142.

    Hopefully.

  446. mappamundorumon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:34 pm

    Aleph-Omega.

  447. David J. Batistaon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:34 pm

    84.

  448. Deron Merandaon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:36 pm

    -1

  449. Loganon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:36 pm

    8675309

  450. Justinon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:37 pm

    1998

  451. drichon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:38 pm

    Because nobody else is likely to pick it.

    Kaitou Kid’s number… 1412

  452. Marc Moskowitzon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:39 pm

    8,243,721.
    Ernie’s favorite number.

  453. Tomon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:39 pm

    37?

  454. Davidon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:39 pm

    e^(pi*i)

  455. greenjeton 01 Oct 2009 at 4:40 pm

    Hey, 98.6
    It’s good to be alive.

  456. rob Kon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:41 pm

    3.14159, ’cause who doesn’t like pi?

  457. MEGon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:42 pm

    101

  458. evildanon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:43 pm

    1987

  459. pwstrainon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:46 pm

    2349872348979283742340093234820981230981

  460. George Galuschakon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:47 pm

    443.

    What’s a Google Wave?

  461. Jon Lundyon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:48 pm

    449 because that should be the comment number for this comment.

  462. Jon Lundyon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:49 pm

    Or 452 :)

  463. Michael Kirklandon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:49 pm

    2525

  464. Gordon Williamson 01 Oct 2009 at 4:49 pm

    8793

  465. BeVibeon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:49 pm

    1013

    (no reason)

  466. pizzangston 01 Oct 2009 at 4:52 pm

    google?

  467. Nightskyon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:53 pm

    -192.8

  468. Toby Bianchion 01 Oct 2009 at 4:55 pm

    1.

  469. kitton 01 Oct 2009 at 4:55 pm

    47.

    Because that’s my jersey number. And a prime number. Makes it doubly cool.

    Please send the invite to my mom, she’s interested in this new Wave-thingy. Oh wait, no, I already sent one to her after I sent one to you. See? You rank ABOVE my mother.

  470. CSI Seattleon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:56 pm

    10022009

  471. sson 01 Oct 2009 at 4:56 pm

    15,892

  472. Danielon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:57 pm

    747

  473. Samon 01 Oct 2009 at 4:59 pm

    149 – the first 3 squares, the ratio of the sides of the Monolith in 2001: A Space Odyssey.

    667 – the neighbor of the beast

    123456789

    10012009
    20091001
    1001

    How many guesses do we get again?

  474. Rorikon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:01 pm

    1024

  475. jkaymartinon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:02 pm

    108

  476. John Douglasson 01 Oct 2009 at 5:06 pm

    120

    The number on the Prisoner’s license plates: KAR120C

  477. Alon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:07 pm

    872

  478. halcyonon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:08 pm

    4,897 is totally the right number. Right?

  479. Sean L.on 01 Oct 2009 at 5:09 pm

    549

  480. atsikoon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:09 pm

    186

  481. DavidKon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:10 pm

    2390

    diameter of Pluto in km

  482. Bob Webberon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:10 pm

    Maybe… 79?

  483. Bob Webberon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:12 pm

    Uh oh, somebody not you already picked 79. How about 97?

  484. Malkaraon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:12 pm

    2002.

  485. Bob Webberon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:13 pm

    Er, thought 93 but typed 97. So, I am guessing 93.

  486. A. S. Wilsonon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:17 pm

    863, just because

  487. whydontyouon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:17 pm

    8684

  488. MSBakeron 01 Oct 2009 at 5:17 pm

    Uh…’D’

  489. Richard Gadsdenon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:17 pm

    The fine structure constant. Perhaps the closest a simple number comes to being the answer to life the universe and everything.

    It’s about 1/137:

    7.297352570(5)×10−3 is the best current estimate – it’s e^2cμ0 / 2h (ie the charge on an electron squared time the speed of light, times the permittivity of free space divided by twice Planck’s constant)

  490. A. S. Wilsonon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:18 pm

    infinity minus one

  491. A. S. Wilsonon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:19 pm

    ok, 863 then

  492. Johnon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:19 pm

    148

  493. Xelgaexon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:19 pm

    3754

  494. tyger11on 01 Oct 2009 at 5:19 pm

    Square root of negative infinity.

  495. Anny Mouseon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:20 pm

    I’m gonna guess 1998, the year Athena was born. I didn’t have time to go through and read all the rest of the replies though so sorry if it’s a repeat (this page took FOREVER to load).

  496. Ryanon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:20 pm

    578

  497. Mark Whybirdon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:22 pm

    8. Suprisingly, I don’t think anyone else has guessed that yet, though searching for it is hard.
    Or:
    8 and a half. No reason.

  498. Gargantuaon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:23 pm

    Zero !

  499. keefon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:25 pm

    86. It burns in my mind’s eye.

  500. Mark Whybirdon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:27 pm

    171

  501. fellow-ohioanon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:27 pm

    07734

  502. Mark Whybirdon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:28 pm

    18. (just looking for simple things not taken yet)

  503. Irene Delseon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:29 pm

    No 1138 yet? Are we among geeks or what?

  504. biff3000on 01 Oct 2009 at 5:31 pm

    23,001

  505. Jennaon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:34 pm

    437

  506. Rembranton 01 Oct 2009 at 5:35 pm

    dayam! almost 500 posts in three hours. 494 as of my typing this so that’s my number. 494 Hope I don’t win. I don’t even know what Google Wave is. Heh.

  507. LizrdGizrdon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:42 pm

    123456789

  508. Tomon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:43 pm

    256?

  509. Mark Whybirdon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:44 pm

    I submit the following nunbers. Being nerdy, I loaded the existing comments into a spreadsheet, filtered and sorted, and herby submit all the integers from 0 to 100 not already claimed.
    (it is possible and likely I missed some integers with additional text in the comments enough to confuse my spreadsheet filter)
    4
    9
    14
    15
    16
    20
    22
    25
    26
    28
    30
    34
    35
    39
    46
    49
    51
    53
    54
    56
    58
    60
    61
    62
    63
    64
    66
    68
    69
    70
    72
    74
    76
    77
    78
    80
    81
    82
    85
    88
    89
    90
    93
    94
    95
    96
    98
    :-)

  510. Cheshilon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:47 pm

    I’m gonna have to go with 81, even though comment 500 technically grabbed it.

  511. Kiaraon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:49 pm

    432!

  512. Erich T. Wadeon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:49 pm

    8i.

    You know, just in case.

  513. pizzangston 01 Oct 2009 at 5:50 pm

    googolplex

  514. Meganon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:53 pm

    58!

  515. Flicton 01 Oct 2009 at 5:55 pm

    of course 9!!!

  516. Monkon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:55 pm

    47,323

  517. Richardon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:57 pm

    I’m going with 5. Unless you have an oddly shaped hand.

  518. ravenshrikeon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:58 pm

    4326

  519. hugh57on 01 Oct 2009 at 5:59 pm

    51069

  520. Pennyon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:59 pm

    872 :)

  521. nicoleon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:02 pm

    11.2 Just because

  522. Rajeshon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:03 pm

    infinity – 1

  523. polerbereon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:06 pm

    7456?

  524. Patrickon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:08 pm

    523.

  525. Justmeon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:08 pm

    446

  526. Matthew in Austinon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:09 pm

    -100

  527. Omaha Lisaon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:11 pm

    55

  528. pizzangston 01 Oct 2009 at 6:14 pm

    2112

  529. Valerieon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:14 pm

    3

  530. Paulon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:18 pm

    987654321

  531. Sihayaon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:20 pm

    522

  532. Andrew Neelyon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:21 pm

    445

  533. Kaitlinon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:28 pm

    7!

  534. Al Taranconon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:30 pm

    o, zero, ou…

  535. Bennyon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:34 pm

    72,563,981,754

  536. pedantic peasanton 01 Oct 2009 at 6:35 pm

    My standard “random” number is 5,238

    [My other guesses would have been pi and e.

    Thanks!

  537. Hankon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:35 pm

    421

  538. Alexon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:36 pm

    117

  539. pedantic peasanton 01 Oct 2009 at 6:37 pm

    Hey Mr. Scalzi:

    Just out of curiosity, when you say “closest” is that closest arithmetically, or a Price is Right kind of closest, where it’s closest to intent, or closest without going over, or something like that?

  540. steveon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:37 pm

    7945

  541. Sarahon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:38 pm

    2009

  542. steveon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:38 pm

    wait a minute; google

  543. yearaon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:38 pm

    71

  544. Craig M.on 01 Oct 2009 at 6:39 pm

    I wanted to pick 0, but someone has already, and feel it is important to mention that fact – harrumph! So I pick 649.

  545. Sarahon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:39 pm

    Ooh, I want to change my guess to 316006

  546. Bennyon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:40 pm

    I also submit 777

  547. Jimon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:41 pm

    I’m not sure what google wave is, or I’d be looking up John, Athena, and the Mrs. birthdays and looking for months/days that haven’t been claimed yet.
    :-)

  548. Rykkon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:41 pm

    01123581321

  549. sethrotullon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:43 pm

    I’ll go with the Mersenne prime (2^43,112,609 − 1). I’m not sure if this conflicts with @419, seeing as it’s the largest “known” prime number.

    As a backup let’s say Avagadro’s number (approx 6.022 141 79 × 10^23).

  550. Adam Oon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:44 pm

    It’s gotta be 51999

  551. Scott Milleron 01 Oct 2009 at 6:45 pm

    1000000 + 1

  552. Steboon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:48 pm

    242

  553. Ed H.on 01 Oct 2009 at 6:49 pm

    1962.

  554. Daneon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:51 pm

    3.14159265389793238462643383
    (that’s all I have memorized….)(why, yes, I am a nerd)

  555. Vankneeon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:55 pm

    858393

  556. Brandonon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:58 pm

    #0

    Wait! Whats the rules around if someone already picked the number you picked?

    Is it first post, first served or is it based on whoever guessed it with more feeling?

  557. Williamon 01 Oct 2009 at 6:58 pm

    23

  558. Garyon 01 Oct 2009 at 7:01 pm

    1954

  559. Paton 01 Oct 2009 at 7:01 pm

    The square root of 2.
    1.414…

  560. Mike Kranjcevichon 01 Oct 2009 at 7:05 pm

    Cherries!! er, very small Rocks!! Bread!!

  561. skipjimon 01 Oct 2009 at 7:10 pm

    I’ll go with 664 (the neighbor of the Beast)

  562. Mauon 01 Oct 2009 at 7:14 pm

    22 for sure.

  563. Chris Gon 01 Oct 2009 at 7:20 pm

    I’m going with 212.

  564. Brad Jon 01 Oct 2009 at 7:20 pm

    1998

  565. Ian Mon 01 Oct 2009 at 7:22 pm

    I’ll go with the number google

  566. Plinyon 01 Oct 2009 at 7:30 pm

    How ’bout 1596062991? Or is the other way round – 978-1596062993?

  567. Stevenon 01 Oct 2009 at 7:32 pm

    53,595

  568. Chris Hsiangon 01 Oct 2009 at 7:33 pm

    Green

  569. GSLambon 01 Oct 2009 at 7:35 pm

    559

  570. David D. Egglion 01 Oct 2009 at 7:37 pm

    e^(i*pi)?

  571. Brian Whiteon 01 Oct 2009 at 7:38 pm

    511

  572. Nateon 01 Oct 2009 at 7:40 pm

    65456

  573. martyon 01 Oct 2009 at 7:41 pm

    What number are you thinking right now, right now when? Like, right now right now, or right now when you posted?

    Because right now right now you’re thinking about bacon. And Bacon isn’t a number.

    Dammit, now you’re thinking about your Hugo awards. Give it a rest.

    9675309

  574. David D. Egglion 01 Oct 2009 at 7:41 pm

    Hmm… Should have read the comments first. Let’s go with 3125 or 5^5. I’ve always thought base 5 more natural than base 10, so I’m hoping you do the same.

  575. Daveon 01 Oct 2009 at 7:41 pm

    525600

  576. shaneon 01 Oct 2009 at 7:43 pm

    202

  577. Dianaon 01 Oct 2009 at 7:49 pm

    23.

  578. Angieon 01 Oct 2009 at 7:54 pm

    18

  579. Josh Jasperon 01 Oct 2009 at 7:57 pm

    Bacon isn’t a number, but Scalzi has a bacon number. John Scalzi works on Stargate Universe, which has actor Lou Diamond Phillips in it. He was in Striking Range with Glenn Morshower, who was in The River Wild with Kevin Bacon

    Ergo, Scalzi has a bacon number of 3.

  580. edon 01 Oct 2009 at 7:59 pm

    29

  581. Lavanya Sixon 01 Oct 2009 at 7:59 pm

    Negative 5

  582. Atrytoneon 01 Oct 2009 at 7:59 pm

    862

  583. Steveon 01 Oct 2009 at 8:00 pm

    -1,894,841

  584. turtlesongon 01 Oct 2009 at 8:01 pm

    8691 (twitter followers)

  585. John Scalzion 01 Oct 2009 at 8:03 pm

    Time’s up and we have a winner.

  586. Elyseon 01 Oct 2009 at 8:04 pm

    Nooooooooooo. It’s still 7:59pm, right? I’ll just guess 18,753 for the heck of it.

  587. Chrison 01 Oct 2009 at 8:07 pm

    721

  588. Chrison 01 Oct 2009 at 8:07 pm

    Bugger. My clock is off.

  589. thepion 01 Oct 2009 at 9:30 pm

    all the cool numbers are taken, i pick bacon

  590. Leo Petron 01 Oct 2009 at 10:49 pm

    67.5

  591. WHassingeron 01 Oct 2009 at 11:42 pm

    2 million 500 thousand (tons of spinning metal, all alone in the night.)

  592. Nobodyrealon 02 Oct 2009 at 1:02 am

    413

  593. Janeon 02 Oct 2009 at 3:00 am

    4

  594. Chris Sullinson 02 Oct 2009 at 4:34 am

    Somewhere around -700?

    I’m tempted to guess interesting numbers, like the largest known Mersenne prime, or just a run-of-the-mill imaginary number. But I don’t want to mess up my chances. Besides, I just did an in-page search for “Mersenne”, and it’s already taken. *sigh*

  595. Chris Sullinson 02 Oct 2009 at 4:35 am

    Why do I not read the rules before posting?

  596. Itkovianon 02 Oct 2009 at 5:26 am

    e.

  597. alumiereon 02 Oct 2009 at 8:06 am

    2243

  598. John Scalzion 02 Oct 2009 at 8:08 am

    People, the contest is over now and has been for 12 hours.

  599. gajin21on 02 Oct 2009 at 8:46 am

    1001001 (w a nod to Rush)

  600. Richardon 02 Oct 2009 at 8:48 am

    425698

  601. TheCosmicKahunaon 02 Oct 2009 at 12:27 pm

    Can I ask:
    What was the number?

  602. TheCosmicKahunaon 02 Oct 2009 at 12:29 pm

    BELAY THAT!
    I went a step forwards, and didn’t bother checking the *actual* blog!

    Me = Fool.

Comments RSS

Leave a Reply (See: Comment Policy)