<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Boy&#8217;s Own Genre, or Not</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/10/13/a-boys-own-genre-or-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/10/13/a-boys-own-genre-or-not/</link>
	<description>I FORGET WHAT EIGHT WAS FOR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:58:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Scalzi</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/10/13/a-boys-own-genre-or-not/#comment-171174</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Scalzi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatever.scalzi.com/?p=8770#comment-171174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Closing up shop now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Closing up shop now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Summer</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/10/13/a-boys-own-genre-or-not/#comment-171172</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Summer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatever.scalzi.com/?p=8770#comment-171172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And And @ 410: &lt;i&gt;Seeing someone pat a guy on the head and go ‘there there dear, it’s only mean girls who think like that’&lt;/i&gt;

Which is not something I have done. If you&#039;re going to put up strawmen so you can have something to shoot at, could you at least have the decency not to paste my face and name on them?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And And @ 410: <i>Seeing someone pat a guy on the head and go ‘there there dear, it’s only mean girls who think like that’</i></p>
<p>Which is not something I have done. If you&#8217;re going to put up strawmen so you can have something to shoot at, could you at least have the decency not to paste my face and name on them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Ranapia</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/10/13/a-boys-own-genre-or-not/#comment-171171</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig Ranapia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatever.scalzi.com/?p=8770#comment-171171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robin@514:
&lt;i&gt;I readily agree that the weight of society and history makes the ovary version sound violent and horrific, while the balls version is used so often that it doesn’t provoke the same reaction.&lt;/i&gt;

ORLY?  I seem to recall a hell of a lot of reaction when Hillary Clinton was called things like &quot;a ball-breaker&quot; or &quot;castrating shrew&quot; because that&#039;s always a nice way to dismiss and marginalise uppity ladies, isn&#039;t it?  Trot out the metaphors of sexualised violence and genital mutilation to dog-whistle that she&#039;s not a real woman and therefore can safely be ignored.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robin@514:<br />
<i>I readily agree that the weight of society and history makes the ovary version sound violent and horrific, while the balls version is used so often that it doesn’t provoke the same reaction.</i></p>
<p>ORLY?  I seem to recall a hell of a lot of reaction when Hillary Clinton was called things like &#8220;a ball-breaker&#8221; or &#8220;castrating shrew&#8221; because that&#8217;s always a nice way to dismiss and marginalise uppity ladies, isn&#8217;t it?  Trot out the metaphors of sexualised violence and genital mutilation to dog-whistle that she&#8217;s not a real woman and therefore can safely be ignored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Summer</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/10/13/a-boys-own-genre-or-not/#comment-171170</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Summer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatever.scalzi.com/?p=8770#comment-171170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeez... I go offline for a couple of days, and miss a lot. Wading in to read now, but I have to address something Robin said in #408:

&lt;i&gt;Is it so strange to you that more than one person might independently come to the same conclusion? &lt;/i&gt;

Not at all, and that isn&#039;t what I was labeling as &quot;groupthink&quot;. What I labeled as groupthink was the attempt by those who had come to that conclusion to engage in coercion; in effect, to say to me, &quot;Summer, all the other women here have decided that we think X, and your stubborn refusal to get with the program and stop maintaining a different opinion is a betrayal of your gender. You can&#039;t be a &lt;i&gt;real&lt;/i&gt; feminist unless you agree with us on X.&quot;

There are other words I could use to describe that sort of thing, of course. Trust me when I tell you that &quot;groupthink&quot; is by far the kindest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeez&#8230; I go offline for a couple of days, and miss a lot. Wading in to read now, but I have to address something Robin said in #408:</p>
<p><i>Is it so strange to you that more than one person might independently come to the same conclusion? </i></p>
<p>Not at all, and that isn&#8217;t what I was labeling as &#8220;groupthink&#8221;. What I labeled as groupthink was the attempt by those who had come to that conclusion to engage in coercion; in effect, to say to me, &#8220;Summer, all the other women here have decided that we think X, and your stubborn refusal to get with the program and stop maintaining a different opinion is a betrayal of your gender. You can&#8217;t be a <i>real</i> feminist unless you agree with us on X.&#8221;</p>
<p>There are other words I could use to describe that sort of thing, of course. Trust me when I tell you that &#8220;groupthink&#8221; is by far the kindest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Ranapia</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/10/13/a-boys-own-genre-or-not/#comment-171168</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig Ranapia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatever.scalzi.com/?p=8770#comment-171168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Can I also suggest to you that using violent imagery is sometimes effective in grabbing attention when being polite and nice and civil isn’t?&lt;/i&gt;

Of course it does Ann -- just ask the wing-nuts who front up to town hall meeting with &quot;Hitlerized&quot; pictures of President Obama, while Glenn Beck has another crying jag about Obama&#039;s secret socialist agenda to smother Trig Palin with his own hands. 

They&#039;ve certainly done a good job of dominating media coverage the health care debate, yes?
Personally, I&#039;d rather have an polite, nice, civil ... reality-based and more or less sane debate between adults on a matter of public policy that affects the health and well-being of millions.  

But whatever... If you decide being a cyber-bully is some grand feminist statement and you&#039;re so righteous you&#039;ve no responsibility to treat others with civility or respect, fine.  Sounds a lot like the same old bullshit in a brand new box to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Can I also suggest to you that using violent imagery is sometimes effective in grabbing attention when being polite and nice and civil isn’t?</i></p>
<p>Of course it does Ann &#8212; just ask the wing-nuts who front up to town hall meeting with &#8220;Hitlerized&#8221; pictures of President Obama, while Glenn Beck has another crying jag about Obama&#8217;s secret socialist agenda to smother Trig Palin with his own hands. </p>
<p>They&#8217;ve certainly done a good job of dominating media coverage the health care debate, yes?<br />
Personally, I&#8217;d rather have an polite, nice, civil &#8230; reality-based and more or less sane debate between adults on a matter of public policy that affects the health and well-being of millions.  </p>
<p>But whatever&#8230; If you decide being a cyber-bully is some grand feminist statement and you&#8217;re so righteous you&#8217;ve no responsibility to treat others with civility or respect, fine.  Sounds a lot like the same old bullshit in a brand new box to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GregLondon</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/10/13/a-boys-own-genre-or-not/#comment-171167</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GregLondon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatever.scalzi.com/?p=8770#comment-171167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Ohio is one of those weird states when it comes to Daylights Savings Time. Sometimes they do DST, sometimes they don&#039;t, or they do it at a different time than everyone else.

I remember back in teh 80&#039;s I think, when everyone was talking about the metric system, Ohio decided to convert to a metric calendar. Their weeks were ten days long. There were ten hours in a day. and somehow they rearranged it so there were ten months a year.  It was totally messed up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Ohio is one of those weird states when it comes to Daylights Savings Time. Sometimes they do DST, sometimes they don&#8217;t, or they do it at a different time than everyone else.</p>
<p>I remember back in teh 80&#8242;s I think, when everyone was talking about the metric system, Ohio decided to convert to a metric calendar. Their weeks were ten days long. There were ten hours in a day. and somehow they rearranged it so there were ten months a year.  It was totally messed up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/10/13/a-boys-own-genre-or-not/#comment-171165</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatever.scalzi.com/?p=8770#comment-171165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since apparently commenting is still allowed as of this moment... I&#039;m honestly a bit surprised that so many people took the reference to ovaries as extreme, especially given how much verbiage was supporting the idea of reversal.  There are a hell of a lot of expressions referring to testicles, which some women understandably find to be inapropos and change to their female-anatomy equivalent.  Can you deny that &quot;shot the feminist movement in the balls&quot; is rather wrong-sounding?  Would you have given Ann hell for saying it?  For which reason?

I readily agree that the weight of society and history makes the ovary version sound violent and horrific, while the balls version is used so often that it doesn&#039;t provoke the same reaction.  Part of this is because there&#039;s no equivalent slang term for ovaries, and this is an aspect of the general problem of gendered language...yet another form of silencing women.  So many phrases that have masculine overtones or undertones, reinforcing the view of the world as belonging only to men.

Gotta cut this short before I run out of time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since apparently commenting is still allowed as of this moment&#8230; I&#8217;m honestly a bit surprised that so many people took the reference to ovaries as extreme, especially given how much verbiage was supporting the idea of reversal.  There are a hell of a lot of expressions referring to testicles, which some women understandably find to be inapropos and change to their female-anatomy equivalent.  Can you deny that &#8220;shot the feminist movement in the balls&#8221; is rather wrong-sounding?  Would you have given Ann hell for saying it?  For which reason?</p>
<p>I readily agree that the weight of society and history makes the ovary version sound violent and horrific, while the balls version is used so often that it doesn&#8217;t provoke the same reaction.  Part of this is because there&#8217;s no equivalent slang term for ovaries, and this is an aspect of the general problem of gendered language&#8230;yet another form of silencing women.  So many phrases that have masculine overtones or undertones, reinforcing the view of the world as belonging only to men.</p>
<p>Gotta cut this short before I run out of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Ranapia</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/10/13/a-boys-own-genre-or-not/#comment-171164</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig Ranapia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatever.scalzi.com/?p=8770#comment-171164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ann:

No you can&#039;t -- I&#039;ve spent way to much time today dealing with someone else on-line who is trying on that derail double-flip (thankfully, nobody else is buying) so I&#039;m out of patience.  It&#039;s a nice trolling tactic to accuse others of your own behaviour, in an attempt to change the subject onto safer ground but I&#039;m not going to take the bait.

Thanks for playing, come again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann:</p>
<p>No you can&#8217;t &#8212; I&#8217;ve spent way to much time today dealing with someone else on-line who is trying on that derail double-flip (thankfully, nobody else is buying) so I&#8217;m out of patience.  It&#8217;s a nice trolling tactic to accuse others of your own behaviour, in an attempt to change the subject onto safer ground but I&#8217;m not going to take the bait.</p>
<p>Thanks for playing, come again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xopher</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/10/13/a-boys-own-genre-or-not/#comment-171162</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xopher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatever.scalzi.com/?p=8770#comment-171162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm, I wonder if Scalzi meant Central Time?  And are we playing &quot;Last Word Loses&quot; here?  And what about Naomi?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I wonder if Scalzi meant Central Time?  And are we playing &#8220;Last Word Loses&#8221; here?  And what about Naomi?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GregLondon</title>
		<link>http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/10/13/a-boys-own-genre-or-not/#comment-171161</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GregLondon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatever.scalzi.com/?p=8770#comment-171161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[with a hint of almond]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with a hint of almond</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

