The Big Idea: Leah Cypess

In talking about her new novel Nightspell for the Big Idea, author Leah Cypess gets a little meta… about the concept of a big idea, and how it relates to writing books, and, of course, specifically this one. And while this sort of recursive examination of big ideas is interesting, considering the context, what it also reveals in a larger sense is how writers can change their approach to writing over the years, and how those changes can benefit the writing. Cypess takes it from here.

LEAH CYPESS:

When I was a teenager, I was not a believer in Big Ideas in fiction.  I wanted my books to tell me good stories and keep me entertained and that was enough; I had plenty of school time for, you know, learning things. When my English teachers talked about how books had to have themes, or even character development, I sighed, rolled my eyes, and went back to reading my father’s collection of Edgar Rice Burroughs books.

I did like intricate plots, though – I read Agatha Christie even more often than Edgar Rice Burroughs – so when I started writing Nightspell at the age of 17, its Big Idea was purely about plot. What if there was a society where murder victims came back as ghosts to try and solve their murders? What would a murder mystery written in that society look like?

I wrote about 50 pages of that book, longhand in a spiral-bound blue notebook, before I ran out of steam. The characters never crystallized and the plot spiraled downward in a series of unnecessary complications. Eventually I gave it up and started writing something new.

It took ten years for me to open that notebook again; and during that time, my tastes in fiction had changed. I still think the primary purpose of a story is to entertain… but I also think it can do more than that. I had been won over to the Big Idea concept.

Nightspell is a book that I probably would never have written if not for a Church & State seminar I took almost a decade after that first attempt. It was one of the best classes I took in law school, and only partly because the professor decided to hold it in his living room (with an awesome view of the Hudson) and provided doughnuts.  The class was small and discussion-oriented, and since it was on a Friday morning, the students who enrolled did so because they were sincerely interested in the subject.

My fellow classmates included Mormons, Catholics, agnostics, and undecided; if I recall correctly, two of them had formerly studied to be priests.  (I was the only woman and one of the only two Jews in the class; when we went around the room on the first day, I solemnly began my introduction with, “I have never studied to be a priest.”) One of the subjects that came up often was the mutual exclusivity of various religious beliefs, and the discussions were honest and unsparing. One of the agnostics maintained that the only way for Americans to live in harmony is for us to all agree on everything (not surprisingly, he thought we should all be agnostics). Others argued that it is possible – though difficult – to believe people are completely wrong, and that there are terrible consequences for their wrongness, but to respect their beliefs anyhow.

When I finally re-opened that blue notebook, these questions were still living in my mind. I didn’t intend for them to make their way into my fantasy murder mystery, but as I began writing the book again from scratch, I found myself being drawn deeper into the implications of what would happen to those ghosts who didn’t find vengeance, whose spirits were never laid to rest. Killers would begin taking care to hide their identities from their victims, so the legions of ghosts would grow larger and larger: a mass of unchanging, immortal people who didn’t fit into anyone’s beliefs about the places of the living and the dead.  Eventually, they would overtake and threaten the living, creating a two-tiered society with suspicion and prejudices on both sides. To many of my characters, ghosts are wronged creatures who shouldn’t be forced to exist at all… and here’s the thing: they’re not wrong.  Or at least, not entirely. So how do they deal with a society designed to accommodate beings who shouldn’t be there in the first place?

In the end, Nightspell is a combination of two ideas. The book is still set in the world of vengeance-seeking ghosts that stuck in my mind for over ten years, still a murder mystery with princes and swordfights and tangled family relationships. But it’s more than that, this time around; it’s about prejudice, and acceptance, and conflicting worldviews. And now that I see what it turned into, I’m really glad I closed that notebook at the age of 17 and didn’t reopen it until the Big Idea was ready.

—-

Nightspell: Amazon|Barnes & Noble|Indiebound|Powell’s

Read the first three chapters. Follow Cypess on Twitter.

9 thoughts on “The Big Idea: Leah Cypess

  1. Sigh…that sound you hear is my Visa® card weeping as it’s forced to buy another book. The idea sounds way too intriguing from the origins in that seminar to the idea itself.

  2. First, thank god for notebooks! What would we have done without them? Second, this post proves that good writing is never wasted. Actually, any writing. Even if no one ever reads it, even if we never open up that metaphorical or literal notebook again, the process of writing something down actually changes us. The experience of it, the act of it, turns a mere thought into something else. That something else may eventually become a great book or screenplay or conversation…, or simply another seed planted in our subconscious that blooms in ways we may never consciously be aware of.

    I am eager to read the book. But more importantly, I think this was a great lesson for all writers, reminding us that our written words are important, no matter where they ultimately lead, and who does or doesn’t ultimately see them. It also teaches us not to freak out if we need to put something aside for an unspecified amount of time…

  3. Yay, NIGHTSPELL has arrived! I was deeply pleased by MISTWOOD, and have pushed it into many a reader’s hands.

  4. Sounds neat. Hopefully I can convince my local library to get a copy of this because otherwise my wallet is going to veto.

  5. alright – yet another book added to “MUST BUY AND READ” list after visiting your blog. you keep making it longer and longer!

    not that I’m complaining, of course. It’s great to look forward to reading a book, and it’s even better when you have not one, not two, but a whole list of such books \o/

  6. I’m very excited to see that Leah Cypess has another book coming out. I bought Mistwood after seeing it in a Big Idea post and loved it. When I didn’t hear much about her after that, I started to worry that the book hadn’t sold enough and that there wouldn’t be a second book.

    I’m already looking around my house to see what personal items I can sell so that I can buy a copy of Nightspell when it comes out.

This is the place where you leave the things you think

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s