Posted on September 25, 2004 Posted by John Scalzi 6 Comments
I’ve been asked this question a couple of times in the last few days, once from a reader, and once from an interviewer: Now that I’ve sold other novels, am I going to try to sell Agent to the Stars?
For those of you coming very late to this party, Agent is the very first novel I wrote, back in 1997. I wrote it primarily to see if I could write a novel (yup), but then made a half-hearted attempt to sell it (nope). When I lost interest in that, I popped it up on the Web site in 1999 as a “shareware” novel, in which people could read it for free and if they liked it, could send me a buck or whatever they wanted. I wanted to see what would happen, basically. In the time since I’ve collected about $4,000 from it, in individual amounts ranging from 65 cents (a one dollar donation after PayPal gets done with it) to $200 (I sent that fellow a free copy of Old Man’s War, because, well. $200 is a lot). The book is still available to be read, and it still gets downloaded a hundred or so times a month, and people still send me money.
The answer to the question of whether I’m now going to try to sell Agent: Probably not. This is not the same as saying I wouldn’t mind seeing Agent in book form. It’s a pretty good story, and I think it’d be reviewed and sell reasonably well, and if someone from a legitimate publishing house wants to come on by and make an offer, I’m willing to listen (it’s happened before, after all). But I’m not going to go out of my way to make a sale.
Why not? Well, basically, I think Agent has value doing what it’s been doing for the last five years: Being an advertisement, if you will, for my other writing. I think people who read Agent and enjoyed it will probably be more likely to consider shelling out for Old Man’s War or other novels because they’re dealing with a novelist they know they like already, not a debut author who is an unknown quantity. When it comes out, Old Man’s War will cost anywhere from $16.77 to $23.95 to pick up — a fair amount to consider spending (although about the same cost as a DVD, a CD, or a used video game, so, you know. It’s still a bargain for your entertainment dollar). If giving away Agent makes someone more comfortable investing in OMW (not to mention recommending it to friends, family and total strangers), that’s a net benefit for me.
Now, by the same token, if they hated Agent, they’ll be less likely to pick up other work of mine. So maybe I’m losing some sales this way as well. But I’m okay with that, actually. One, as a writer, I’d rather have readers make an informed decision; if you’ve read my stuff and don’t like it, that’s fair enough, although hopefully you’ll be in the overall minority. Second, I imagine the reader who didn’t spend any money to find out he or she doesn’t like me would be less inclined to dissuade other readers from me than the one who shelled out $20 and felt he or she got burned. It’s the difference between “Well, I didn’t like him, but maybe you will” and “I wasted money on him, and you shouldn’t bother.” I’d rather lose the reader who knows he doesn’t like me than the reader who might like me but has been warned away.
By and large, however, I think having Agent out there for the reading has been a net benefit for me, and I expect it will become even more so when I my fiction books are finally on the streets, and people come to the site who didn’t know me before. I think this “loss leader” aspect of Agent is important enough, in fact, that if a publisher did want to put out the book in traditional form, I’d make the deal only on the condition that there would still be a freely accessible online version on my own site. My own feeling on this is that it would make publishers hesitant — perhaps less so than a couple of years ago, thanks to Cory Doctorow’s experiment with free online versions of his novels, and also to Baen’s free library, both of which seem to have resulted in a net gain of sales and/or notoriety for the authors, but even so.
I certainly wouldn’t fault a publisher for that position; publishers are in the game to make money. But so am I, and as I’ve mentioned elsewhere, the economics of publishing from the point of view of the writer and the point of view of the publisher are related but they are not the same. Unless someone’s going to offer me hundreds of thousands of dollars for Agent — and they’re not — in the long run I judge that it’s better business for me to have the novel out there as “shareware” than to lock it up in bound form. Again, if a publisher can live with an electronic copy living on this site, then by all means, let’s chat. But I won’t be holding my breath.
Another reason I’m not likely to make a big effort to sell Agent: I’m pretty much done with it. I wrote it almost six years ago now, and since then I’ve had a fair number of other projects to attend to, and I’m working on making sure I have a fair number of projects to attend to after these projects are done. I’d prefer to spend time thinking about what’s coming up next than worrying about what I’ve done in the past; it’s more fun. Fiddling with Agent after all this time just doesn’t strike me as very productive.
Final reason to keep Agent where it is, and this is kind of a gooshy reason: As far as my books go, it’s my firstborn — the first book-length thing I’d ever written. When I was done with it, I was tremendously relieved; I could write something that long. And as a bonus, it wasn’t bad. My first inclination then (and now) wasn’t to sell it, but simply to show it off: Hey! Look what I did! In a very real sense, it’s a joyful creation, whose existence is its own rationale (OMW, while no less good and in some ways better, was in fact written with the market in mind, as were all of my non-fiction books). Anything else it does is just an extra.
So that’s the final reason that I don’t make a huge push to sell it: It’s just more fun to share it. So I do.
(Possibly rude question ahead)
Judging from my own section of bookworld (that is: the lowest level of customer service person in a bookstore), Iíve noticed that most novelists seem to have to earn their way towards a hardback. Yet Old Manís War will be coming out directly in hardback. Besides making my job more difficult (I can usually sell someone a US$7.99 book…), I am curious how you rate a hard back with a first novel. Are there that many people who read the Whatever? Is your following from OPM that large? Something else Iíve not thought of?
Andrew Cory writes:
“I am curious how you rate a hard back with a first novel.”
The person to ask that would be Patrick Nielsen Hayden, since he’d the person who decided hardback was the way to go.
However, I doubt that the Whatever/OPM audience had anything to do with it, since he didn’t know the daily hit numbers of the Whatever when he contacted me with an offer, nor (I think) was he aware that I wrote for OPM.
Of course, the exposure from both of these doesn’t *hurt.* If one percent of OPM readers buy Old Man’s War, I’ll have earned out my advance.
I kind of look at my short stories the same way. I only started getting paid (a stipend, which is like a fee or a royalty, only much, much smaller) last year, but I considered the time, effort, and give away as exposure. People were more likely to read my stuff on the web than in print. (“Read your story in Plots With Guns, and whattaya mean they still print Alfred Hitchcock?” Yeah. I get that a lot.)
It’s a great way to show folks what you’ve got as a writer, but it certainly doesn’t beat getting a Shitty deal, much less a Not Bad or a Shut Up. You know. Where someone at some point actually pays you for your work?
Someone at Tor should field that question, but I’ve noticed that Tor publishes a lot of first novels in hardcovers. I mean they publish a lot of hardcovers full stop. I’d be curious about what their rationale is. Is it because hardcovers are much more likely to get reviewed and thus attract attention and generate more sales?
I’m no book critic (certainly not in *this* company), but for what one man’s opinion is worth:
I downloaded ATTS and liked it, but couldn’t help thinking it would have been better as a movie than as a book. I say this based on the amount of time you spend describing the characters and their surroundings (both physically, as well as their reactions to events & each other). It’s the kind of stuff one could communicate on the screen *without* words, and I think it would make the story flow better.
So, there you go: advice from a non-professional outsider. Don’t publish ATTS – write the screenplay.
I have written four manuscript about:
1. Life after death;
2. Love affairs;
3. Authorbiography and I have published some right here in Nigeria on my own.
I need a publisher for atleast one of the above. Are you willing? If yes, what are your terms?
Thanks and be blessed.