Clouds and Sun
Posted on October 17, 2005 Posted by John Scalzi 7 Comments
Normally I don’t suggest pointing one’s camera at the sun. But in this case the resulting picture was worth it.
Mmmm… lens flare.
Posted on October 17, 2005 Posted by John Scalzi 7 Comments
Normally I don’t suggest pointing one’s camera at the sun. But in this case the resulting picture was worth it.
Mmmm… lens flare.
Category: Uncategorized
Taunting the tauntable since 1998
John Scalzi, proprietor – JS
Athena Scalzi, editor – AMS
About the site
What's the Big Idea? Authors explaining the the big ideas behind their latest works, in their own words. See the latest Big Ideas!
Authors/Editors/Publicists: for information on how to participate, click here.
Theme: Profile by Organic Themes.
Lensflares are way overrated. Just ask anyone who played 3d games back in the age of 3dfx.
Oh, I really like that one.
Hmm, I’m wondering if there are any damage to the camera for exposing it directly to sunlight?
Doubtful, but I wouldn’t recommend looking through the viewfinder to take the picture…
WOW!!!!! That is B-E-A-U-T-I-F-U-L-!!!!!!! Keep them coming!!!
Anonymous:
Artificial Lensflare is repulsively over-used.
Natural lensflare is typically avoided in professional photography since it obstructs view of the actually desired target.
But as a purely observed phenomenon, it’s not bad looking.
I think for short periods of time it’s OK, but you don’t want to over do it. I tried taking pictures of an eclipse once, and left the camera mounted on a tripod pointed at the sun for an extended period of time. The light meter in the camera was ruined, which I didn’t discover until getting back the next set of pictures I took. That was a film camera, but I doubt the sensors in a digital camera would appreciate being treated like that either.