Photoshop as Time Machine
Posted on January 3, 2006 Posted by John Scalzi 21 Comments
Author Cherie Priest, whose Flickr-based exhibition streak is even wider than my own, recently posted a set of potential book jacket photos which feature her in a really excellent dress of the sort that you’d see on an ingenue in an MGM musical. So I fired up the Photoshop and gave one of the photos the black-and-white 1940s glamor treatment, which you can see above. I think it turned out well, and I’m glad to see my Photoshop editing skills are not limited to turning dear family members into bloodsucking monstrosities. Ms. Priest liked it well enough to put it in her Flickr photostream, so that’s a positive. All those hours of playing with Photoshop when I should have been writing are finally paying off.
Having said that, this is by far the best picture in the set, and needs not a bit of Photoshoppery. Hot redhead, great dress and a sense of humor? Hard to beat that (unless, of course, she also happens to write fine books).
Sadly, none of my author photos look as good as any in Ms. Priest’s set. Clearly, I need to find a more fabulous dress.
Haha! Many thanks again, darling. In truth, this was just a “dress up and play” session with a camera; I figured if we both had fun with it, a few good (potential author/book) shots were bound to come of it.
I think you may be right, Cherie. Very nice pictures in any event.
I’m also glad you considered the picture in the correct “here’s some guy having fun with Photoshop” context and not the “hmmm, this has a creepy stalker vibe” context. One does wish to stay on the right side of that particular line.
Nice. She just needs the long cigarette holder to be straight out of any black and white movie…
I kind of prefer this one to the one above, although that one I do agree looks more “classic Hollywood” when converted to B&W.
with all due respect, sir, the fabulous dress would be meaningless without the cleavage.
I could make cleavage. But you wouldn’t like it.
Wow. Literate, attractive, and successful.
Is she single? ;-)
Not for long. She’s getting married in March.
Scalzi, my tip for improving your own author photo would be to not take it yourself by holding the camera out in front of your face, thus giving you that weird “I’m holding a camera out in front of my face look”. You don’t really need to go to the extreme lengths of a dress and make up—getting someone else to take the photo would be just fine.
Maybe… or I could wear a better dress.
Cue Brando voice…“The horror…the horror…”
Eeeeiiiiiii! My eyes! My eyes!
For shame, Martin. For shame. That is just so wrong on so many levels.
Martin, that just pushed my “creeped-out” meter all the way into the red. Good job!
Not even the most beautiful dress in the world will save a photo featuring scrunch neck.
May I ask the recipe to do that to a photo? Happy if you reply by email when time permits if it’s too arduous to write up quickly.
Ha! That ‘Peeps’ pic is bloody brilliant!
Andrew, assuming you’re familiar with Photoshop CS2:
It’s basically desaturate, healing brush to even out skin tone, copy result to new layer, use gaussian blur on that layer and then fade it back 50-60% for the classic “soft focus” look. Then increase the contrast. I also used the “liquify” tool on CS2 for a bit of tweaking. That’s pretty much it.
Yup. Familiar. And thanks.
Oh, and is the time of post accurate? 5:09am. Are you up, or still up?
Eck! 5:33am I should have typed.
Yeah, I’m up. Went to sleep early, got up early. Happens sometimes.