TAD in the Winston-Salem Journal

I’ve just read what has got to be the nicest negative review I’ve ever gotten. While book ultimately isn’t the reviewer’s cup of tea, he also writes things like “John Scalzi is a writer of crystalline clarity and wit,” and “there is no ambiguity in Scalzi’s talent ” and so on and so forth. It’s like a paramour telling you they just want be friends and then buying you a new car to ease the breakup.

18 Comments on “TAD in the Winston-Salem Journal”

  1. That’s one of the strangest reviews of anything I’ve ever read. The reviewer writes much less about the merits of the book than he does about his qualifications (or lack thereof) to judge it.

    Sort of like a restaurant critic writing, “I don’t particularly like clams, but this chef has a bunch of awards, so they must be good, even though I gagged”.

    Nice that you liked the warm and fuzzy parts, though.

  2. The funny thing is that the LAST type of novel I would identify Android’s Dream as is “Philip K. Dick homage.” Except maybe by way of (the better aspects of) Total Recall.

  3. I read it recently. Very nice. It reminded me most of Alan Dean Foster’s The Light-Years Beneath My Feet, and I have no idea why.
    Also read Old Man’s War. I love the library hold system; even if it takes me a few weeks to actually get the book I request, I still get the book I request.

  4. I agree — this is one of the negative reviews you hope for, if you must have negative reviews.

  5. Hmm. I recognize that. That’s, “Everybody likes this Scalzi guy’s books except me. What’s wrong with me?” I’ve done that number about several well respected sf writers myself, though not our host. (Well, ok, Connie Willis, Gene Wolfe, and Jonathan Lethem if you must know.) Then I realized that sometimes, you’re just tone deaf in the register they’re writing in and there’s nothing to be done except quit trying and read some stuff you do enjoy.


  6. MKK:

    Yup. One of the things one hopes to learn is to recognize when something when something is done well, but it’s just not for you.

  7. The other possibility is that everyone likes it cause it is trendy, but it is really not that good in a intrinsic sense. Sorta like Enron or the dotcoms.

  8. I would second his comment that TAD would make an excellent movie. But then I’d say that’s characteristic of all your novels so far – a fairly straightforward, linear progression and just enough description to let the reader’s imagination paint the scene without getting bogged down by the details. The qualities that make your books such fun to read (tight, well-paced stories with engaging plots) also make them ideal candidates for the big screen.

  9. What did you think of that book by the liberal Australian guy that made fun of affinity marketing programs?

  10. I confess I have never read The Einsteinian Intersection (and have never been a big Samuel R. Delany fan). How does it compare to TAD?

  11. He wants a more flippant tone? How is that possible? Isn’t death by fart flippant enough?

  12. I don’t think anything can be as gonzo as death by fart. I think the rest of the book balances the witty with the tension fairly well….there’s just one spot where I’d quibble about the dark nature of a scene compared to the rest of the book, and while I twitched a little, it didn’t dampen my appreciation for the rest of the book.