A Month of Writers, Day Twelve: Naomi Kritzer

Hard as it may be to believe now, there once was a time in which I was not the giddy geek social butterfly you all know and adore (or, at least, tolerate). At one time I knew hardly any other science fiction and fantasy writers at all, and that time was actually not that long ago: 2002, actually, right up until I sold Old Man’s War to Tor and people went “wha?” because I sold the book off the Web site. One of the few writers I did know was Naomi Kritzer, whose debut book Fires of the Faithful had just come out in that year of 2002, and which I thought was really good, because it wasn’t in a bog-standard fantasy setting, and the folks in it talked normally (an excellent trait she shares with Steven Brust). Since then she’s published four more novels, including the excellent Dead Rivers trilogy (set in an alternate Kazakhstan, which is awesome just in itself), of which Freedom’s Sisters is the latest.

Naomi and I had the bonding experience of being neo-pros together, but she was a few books ahead of me, which was great, because those first couple of years of being a pro writer can be pretty damn disorienting, and I know I appreciated having a guide. Naomi was very generous in conversation discussing how the publishing process went down for her, which the note-taking, not-quite-published me really benefited from. Everyone should have someone like Naomi Kritzer for their neo-pro years. There’s a reason she’s in the OMW acknowledgments.

In addition to being a fine writer, Naomi is also a bit of a world traveler, and in her Month of Writers contribution, she talks about being in a place far away and being a little exotic because of it.

NAOMI KRITZER: The Other Side of the Lens

In 1993, during my junior year of college, I spent a semester studying in Nepal. I chose Nepal because it was remote, exotic, and there was an off-campus studies program that would give me college credit with no further paperwork required on my part. Also, I found Hinduism and Buddhism interesting, and I liked curry.

Towards the end of the program, I got to spend four weeks off by myself, doing an independent project. I spent one of those weeks in a village called Dapcha where we’d stayed with host families early on. On the way there, I got a ride to the village in a jeep for Rs. 70 or so (about $1.20) but on the way back the jeep wasn’t running, so I walked.

Dapcha was about a three-hour walk from Dulikhel, the nearest town of any size. In Dulikhel, the paved road started, and you could catch a bus to Kathmandu. (Sometime after 1993, I think the road through Dapcha got paved. While I was there, they had a dirt road that became a sea of reddish mud during the monsoon season, and was rutted and bumpy the rest of the year.)

A three-hour walk in the U.S. that was purely to get somewhere (as opposed to a hike for recreational purposes) would pretty well suck, but in Nepal, it’s how everyone gets around. There are rest areas with huge shade trees and walls that are built at just the right height to rest your load on without putting it down. (Just as most travel is done on foot, most transportation — bottles of Coke, for example, or grain that needs to go to a mill — is done by humans carrying it. ) People spread out blankets and sell oranges and sliced cucumbers and daikon radishes. Travelers smoke cigarettes and chat with each other while they rest.

As I was sitting under one of these trees, I was approached by a pair of police officers, who wanted to know where I was coming from, and where I was going. I was initially worried that I was in some sort of trouble, but quickly realized that they were just asking me the standard opening questions for a stranger on the road you wanted to chat with. What was I doing in Nepal? Was I married? (That’s another very standard question, incidentally, and the correct answer translates as, “My marriage has not yet occurred.”) Since I was heading towards Dulikhel, and so were they, we walked the rest of the way together. These were small-town cops, going in to district headquarters to make their weekly report — since there was no phone service in their part of the district, they had to come in person.

They asked me all sorts of questions as we walked — about myself, about what I thought of Nepal, etc. I spoke halting but understandable Nepali by that point in my trip, and I’d answered a lot of these questions before, so I was able to at least take a shot at most of them. They were clearly thrilled to find an American who spoke any Nepali at all. They’d seen these exotic foreigners before, but here was one who could actually talk to them.

I should probably mention how I was dressed. I was wearing a kurta surwal (it’s called a salwar kameez in other parts of South Asia) — it’s a long tunic with a pair of very loose-fitting pants underneath. Teresa Nielsen Hayden likes to wear these, so if you’ve seen her at a con, you probably know what I’m talking about. However, hers tend to be really beautiful and ornate; mine was extremely utilitarian. I’d had it made out of a light blue cotton fabric that looked almost denim-like, with no ornamentation at all. I’d wanted something I wouldn’t feel bad about getting filthy, as I wore these the whole time I was in Nepal — my blue jeans stayed in my duffel until I was packing to leave.

In addition to the kurta surwal, I was wearing a necklace made out of marigold flowers; this had been presented to me as part of a ritual blessing by my host mother when I left. And I was wearing my sneakers, because my hiking boots had been annoying me.

The sneakers turned out to be a mistake. I started getting a huge blister on my heel. When my police escort stopped in a village to rest in the shade, I started to dig out some fresh socks, but was distracted by a white person holding what looked like a video camera. This village had a nice (if distant) view of the Himalayas, and this person appeared to be videotaping them. I found this hilarious, and got up and went over to get a closer look. I was thinking about saying something like, “Are they doing anything interesting?” Once I got closer, though, I realized that he was actually holding an incredibly fancy and elaborate SLR camera, and also, that he was the first of a substantial group.

All of them had huge, impossibly fancy cameras. They turned out to come from the St. Louis Camera Club, and were a chartered and escorted trip. The stragglers arrived by van a few minutes later. The weirdest thing was, they found me almost as exotic as the Nepalis had — here I was, a white person, wearing a kurta surwal and able to speak the local language! They asked me all sorts of questions — not whether I was married, but most of the rest were the same questions the police officers had asked me. Where was I going? What was I doing in Nepal? How long had I been here? How long was I staying? What did I think of it?

One of the women asked me how much my backpack weighed. I told her not a whole lot. I was measuring it by Nepali standards, by which it was trivially light. She then picked it up and grunted with disbelief.

We chatted a little longer and then I went back to sit down by the police officers and finish changing my socks. (“Do you know them?” one of them asked me.) I was focusing pretty intently on getting new socks on without pointing the soles of my feet at anyone, since that’s an insult in Nepal, when I heard a click.

One of the women from the camera club had taken my picture. As I laughed in disbelief, she said, “I just had to capture that moment! A true trekker!”

I found that hilarious — I wasn’t trekking, first of all, just walking back from a village. My study-abroad program had included a trek, months earlier, and I had actually been a miserable trekker, always dead last. I was in better shape (and more acclimated to the altitude) after three months in Nepal, but I still thought that description was about as far off as you could get.

But mostly, I was overwhelmed by the weirdness of being the person on the other side of the camera lens. I took hundreds of pictures while I was there (with my crappy little auto-focus camera — if I could do it all over again, I’d buy something much nicer and learn to use it before leaving Northfield). Nepal was full of things I found strange and fascinating, from the political graffiti to the mounds of corn that had been shucked by hand to the autorickshaws. I wanted photos to show my friends and family, and to look at years later.

And now, to someone else — someone from my own country! — I was the strange and exotic object.


I told the story to my parents, and a few months after I got home, my father sent me a copy of the photo. He’d tracked down the St. Louis Camera Club (harder to do back in the dark ages before Google) and through them had found the photographer and requested two copies.

In the picture, I’m unrolling my socks. The police officers on either side of me make it look like I must either be under police protection, or else under arrest. My kurta surwal is pretty dirty, and is dusted with red powder that was also part of the sendoff from my host mother. I am a pretty strange and exotic object, I guess. I might have wanted a picture of me, too.

(original entry, plus comments, here)

16 Comments on “A Month of Writers, Day Twelve: Naomi Kritzer”

  1. > the folks in it talked normally (an excellent trait she shares
    > with Steven Brust).
    “I am certain that I do not know of what you speak,” said Khaavren.

  2. joelfinkle:
    It’s been a while, but I think it would be
    “I am certain that I do not know that of which you speak,”

    It fits an extra word in, and Paarfi can’t resist such things.

  3. Lovely post. I’m particularly interested since I’m planning a trip to India/Nepal next year. It’s funny how as soon as you start investigating something, helpful references show up in the oddest places.

  4. It’s funny to me that you should mention Steven Brust as a reference for people speaking normally. I tried to read his ‘The Phoenix Guards’ once, and got hung up by the language in it. Is there another book or series that I should try, to see why people like him?

  5. The Phoenix Guards’ series is actually written intentionally archaic–it’s supposed to be a rip-off of Alexandre Dumas. The Vlad Taltos series is the one where they speak like normal people. (Trying to read the Phoenix Guards’ after the Taltos books was incredibly jarring to me–the style isn’t anything alike, even though both series are in the same world.) I’d also recommend To Reign in Hell, though it’s not in any series, and not typical fantasy.

  6. “a place where walking was so well-supported”?

    You mean, a place with almost no viable infrastructure usable by other forms of transportation, and thus requiring you to walk in order get anywhere? I’m not saying it’s not a lifestyle that might be preferable to the high speed and concrete version we have here in the U.S., but it’s hardly a matter of the place “supporting” walking … it’s more that they don’t or can’t support anything else, for physical/logistical or financial reasons.

  7. Okay, I wish that here in the U.S. there were shady benches to sit on, walls to rest loads on, and people with fruit stands. On the freeways.

    Might make a big difference during big natural disasters like Katrina…

  8. Around my neighborhood, walking less than a quarter mile to the grocery store means walking on either a very steep and very uneven weedy verge (if you were to slip, trip or twist an ankle, you’d most likely fall directly into traffic) or walking in a very busy highway, literally in the 9″ space between the outside lane marker and the curb, with cars, trucks and semis whipping by inches away from you at 45 miles per hour.

    Ergo, even though I love to walk and would walk almost everywhere if I could, I have to drive to a store that’s 5 minutes away on foot.


    (The sound of the planet groaning under the weight of my corpulent carbon footprint keeps me up at night a lot these days.)

  9. I must (mildly) protest your friend’s hilarity at the notion of videotaping the distant Himalayas on the grounds that they don’t “do” anything interesting. A video shot is not a one-off element, like a still, it’s just part of a connected sequence of shots of varied time length, focal length, camera movement (or not), subject movement (or not) and subject strung together to tell some kind of a story, however basic.

    It may be that most people’s videos are indeed just a series of disconnected random shots. But this (non-existent) videotaper might have used the distant shot of the Himalayas as a full stop after a series of shots of the group driving up the track, and might have followed it with various other shots as the expedition got closer to its goal. Something like that. (“And” and “the” aren’t very exciting words in themselves, but they have their place in many stories.)

    This is my first time commenting here, so hallo. I look in every now and then, originally pointed this way by something in Langford’s Ansible, I think. I’m afraid I haven’t (yet) read any of your books. I look in on Justine Larbalestier’s (above) blog too, and I haven’t (yet) read any of her books either.

%d bloggers like this: