Categories
Uncategorized

Fuzzy Nation Release Date

I have been alerted as to the release date of Fuzzy Nation:

May 10, 2011.

Which is my birthday.

WHICH IS AWESOME.

That is all.

By John Scalzi

I enjoy pie.

48 replies on “Fuzzy Nation Release Date”

#12 – The Wikipedia article describes the original version of the book, which was by H. Beam Piper, who was TOTALLY a libertarian, and BOY does it come out in his work. Not complaining, just saying.

If the new version turns out to advocate socialist solutions to the problems of living with the Fuzzies, I will be amused. Amused enough to buy copies for EVERY LIBERTARIAN I KNOW. Admittedly, that’s one guy, or maybe two, who’ll each be buying their own copy anyway. But still.

Scorpius:

“He did vote for the statist party.”

Well, as noted the other day, I didn’t vote a straight ticket. I rarely do.

Beyond that, as anyone who read OMW and assumed I was right-wing can tell you, one’s perceived leanings in fiction and one’s real world politics don’t always match up.

“Beyond that, as anyone who read OMW and assumed I was right-wing can tell you, one’s perceived leanings in fiction and one’s real world politics don’t always match up.”

Did people seriously think you were right wing based on OMW? Apart from your own point above as regards fiction versus the author, I thought the continuing plot twists forced the reader to examine his sympathies several times.

And hell, I AM right wing!

-or perhaps it was me who misread……

“Many prominent milSF writers are publicly conservative.”

As opposed to privately liberal?

Shame people can’t seperate politics from entertainment – one of my favorite, and the best I think, TV series of recent times was the West Wing. – I didn’t agree with almost any of the characters points of view but it was so well written that I simply didn’t care.

You miss out on so much if you only read people who agree with the opinions you already hold – and miss out on the fun arguments!

I was actually disappointed to find out John was a statist. His description of the ex-Senator who got turned to paste in OMW while trying to implement diplomacy was dead-on a description (pre-pasting) of John Kerry (well, a little smarter than Kerry, who had a lower University grade score than Bush)

Pre-Happy Birthday John! My Fuzzy books are original and very old. They are so old in fact that I can’t really read them, the pages are brown and cracked. These books have been read so many times you can pick it up and the cover is so worn it almost feels like thin silk. I can’t wait for you book, I can’t wait to let my children enjoy your version and come to love a story that so enraptured my thoughts and inspired my dreams with visions of sci-fi from the young age till now.
I’m so excited, I’m blabbering. My birthday is the eleventh of May, what a beautiful gift, something to share with my family. Thank you!

I’m going to buy a copy just for the guy on the front cover*, about whom I have been having very impure thoughts.

*no, not the fuzzy one. I may be shallow, but I’m not *weird*!

If I remember correctly, May 10th is your 42nd birthday. Does Fuzzy Nation reveal the meaning of life, the universe, and everything? Give us a reason to buy your book!

27 by John Scalzi:

Many prominent milSF writers are publicly conservative.

Or they’re assumed to be, even if they’re publicly not.

#33 by Scorpius:

If Bush’s college record is anything like his National Guard record — or pretty much the rest of his life, for that matter — he probably blew off some of his courses but got credit for them anyway.

I’ve read “Old Man’s War” a couple of times and I missed the alleged conservative or libertarian political message. It was just a fun read with some great characters. And I don’t mean that to sound dismissive of the book or Mr. Scalzi’s writing – books that are genuinely just fun to read are few and far between.

I separate my personal politics from my entertainment choices – one could go insane trying to avoid being entertained by those with whom you disagree. I mean, I disagree more often than not with Alec Baldwin, but as long as he makes with the funny on “30 Rock,” I don’t care what he says on talk shows.

re#41: agreed, in my mind the classic example is Tom Cruise – on talk shows he appears to be a NUT (don’t even get me started on his stated views of psychiatry, scientology and a bunch of other stuff) but I realize tha all of that really isn’t important. Mr. Cruise’s views on reality really don’t matter – he’s an entertainer/artist. I choose to judge his work based solely on the merits of his work. NOW, if he decides to go into politics he may not get my vote – I don’t see how he could represent ME

Comments are closed.

Exit mobile version