Lock In Afterthoughts
Now that Lock In is done and sent into its editor, some thoughts on writing the book.
1. It was a challenging book for me to write. For one, it’s near future, which is not my usual thing, and which presents its own set of challenges, notably that you want to reasonably extrapolate future technology from existing technology without letting current technology overrun you. For two, it takes place in a short span of time (roughly six days) and during those six days a lot has to get covered; no one in this story gets much in the way of sleep (including its author).
For three, it’s explicitly designed to be a thriller with a technological aspect — not a technothriller in the Tom Clancy sense but one in which people use technology to get what they want, and they know their way around the tech pretty darn well — and that has to be balanced with making the people in the story worth caring about. Finally (and for four), I wanted to place a complete story within a world where things are socially and technologically in flux; the story is a snapshot of events within a larger context, and that larger context, while informing the story, goes on nearly heedless to the story’s event.
Oh — and it needs to be fun to read, with occasional murders and explosions and intrigue and maybe even some snappy dialogue dropped in here and there. You know. As you do. Plus there are other things I am trying in this story which I don’t want to reveal at the moment.
So: A lot.
And it had a hard deadline of the end of November, because it’s coming out in August, and we need that time for editing, revisions (if any) copy editing and marketing.
The good news is that I hit my deadline when I needed to. The even better news is that I hit my deadline with a manuscript that I am happy with, and which I think does most of the things I wanted it to do. But I’m not going to say it wasn’t a challenge. This one made me work for it.
Which is not a bad thing, mind you. I think it’s a good thing for me to try to be ambitious with the things I write. You may or may not like what I write, depending on your tastes, and you may or may not think I am successful at hitting what I’m aiming for, again, depending on your tastes. The one thing I would prefer you not to think, whether you like what I do or not, is that I’m just hacking them out without my brain engaged. That’s not the case, I can assure you.
This was annoying but I would not say it was a total waste of time. A lot of worldbuilding got done in those seven chapters, and that worldbuilding was transferable. I had a much clearer idea of everything involving the world and the story I was running through it — including the fact that my former protagonists weren’t getting the job done. They weren’t fired — it wasn’t their fault — they were just demoted. Fortunately, they took the demotions with good grace. And the actual book — the one you’ll read — is better for having gone on the detour.
3. As is fairly typical for how I write, a substantial chunk on the book was written in the last month, with the most substantial portion of that being written right near the end — the point at which all the story points are solved in my head and what’s left isn’t the writing, but just the typing. Unfortunately for me, when I get into the “must finish book” phase, I tend also to snack more or less constantly, with my excuse being that I am feeding my brain. Well, my brain is fed, all right. Sadly, so is my gut. At the moment I weigh 178.4 pounds, which is roughly ten pounds heavier than I was when I started the month of November (you can probably see a bit of the extra poundage in the picture above). So tomorrow I start another diet. Also, for the next book: Learn not to do this again.
4. I noted on the site that for November crunch time I was going to try to avoid news as much as possible, because it was distracting and angried up the blood, and I kind of didn’t need that on deadline. I largely succeeded, with occasional slips, which were duly noted on Twitter. For my sins, someone suggested on a political site that I was using my deadline as an excuse not to comment on the healthcare.gov Web site debacle because liberals like me couldn’t stomach our hero Obama being criticized, or whatever.
Which made me want to say, hey, you can have a novel in 2014 or you can have me snark on Obama’s health care follies, but you can’t have both so pick one. But I didn’t (at least, not until right now). If you look at November blog posts, you’ll also note I didn’t write anything about all the stupid things the GOP/conservatives did in November either, because, you know, I was on a deadline. Also you can’t actually pick which you want, because one’s contractually obliged and the other isn’t.
(For the record: Obama’s November ACA follies: A definitive clusterfuck, for which he and his administration richly deserve the criticism they’ve received. Having your public face for your administration’s signature policy be a 404 for a couple of months is not the way to win friends.)
It was certainly the case that the lack of commentary here had an impact on visits; the visitorship for November was the lowest it was for two years, and as a result it’s entirely possible 2013’s visitor numbers will be lower than 2012’s. C’est la vie. As I’m pretty sure I’ve noted here, pay copy has to take precedence. Because I like living in my house and eating food. But maybe I can make up for it in December with full-frontal nudity:
(Incidentally, if you make the sort of pun-related comment that naturally follows from such a picture if you are twelve, then I will Mallet your comment and tell Santa to put coal in your stocking this year. Just so you know.)
5. And what do I plan to do now? Two words: Video games. Also: sleep. And: Diet. Alas.