Thoughts On This Year’s Hugo Finalist Ballot

In no particular order:

1. First, and obviously, I’m delighted that The Collapsing Empire has been nominated. I like that book a lot, and it has some of my favorite characters ever in it, so to see it on the Hugo ballot this year is real validation for me. To be honest I had no sense of whether the novel was in the awards hunt this year at all — it sold well and the reviews were good, but it was also a wide and varied and very good year for science fiction novels. So when I was notified, well. I was very happy. Thank you to everyone who nominated the book. You made my month.

2. I had no idea whatsoever which other books would be nominated in the novel category (well, that’s not entirely true; I strongly suspected The Stone Sky would get a nod, and sure enough, it did), so when the category came out, including New York 2140, Six Wakes, Provenance and Raven Strategem as well as Empire and Sky, I was also delighted. Here’s the thing: as a writer, when you’re up for an award, you want your fellow finalists to be really really excellent. When your peer group is good, it reflects well on you and your own work. This is a very good, very solid field of works, from some of the best writers working in science fiction and fantasy today. I could not be more pleased to stand among these authors, and to have my work stand among theirs.

3. Because it’s such an excellent year in my category, I can state that I have no freakin’ idea who is the front runner this year. It’s of course polite to say that, but it also happens to be true: I can think of very good reasons why any of the six finalists could get the award this year.

Which is fine with me, I should note. I’m not going to lie, I would be pleased for my novel to win. I am always pleased to win a Hugo. But every author in the category is someone I like or admire, and every novel in the category is award-worthy. I like when worthy works win, even when they are not mine. I will be happy whichever novel gets the rocket this year. It’s a fine year for the Best Novel Hugo.

4. And in fact all up and down the ballot this year, it’s like it is in the novel category: Excellent works and tough choices for the voters. Which, again, is as it should be. I like it when there’s no clear-cut front runner and everyone has to agonize over how they’re going to rank their choices. That’s what makes Hugo voting fun.

As a side bonus, so many of finalists this year are friends of mine and people whose work I admire. It means for me at least the Worldcon this year, and the Hugos, are going to be a blast. We’re gonna have such a good time, folks. You should totally come.

5. To get ahead of a question I know someone will ask, no, there’s not any “puppy” nonsense this year. It appears the changes in nominating finalists to reduce slating had their intended effect, and also, the various puppies appear to have lost interest slamming their heads into this particular wall. This makes sense as it provided no benefit to any of them, damaged the reputations and careers of several, and succeeded only in making their rank and file waste a lot of time and effort (and money). They’ve gone off to make their own awards and/or to bother other media, which is probably a better use of their time. There was an attempt by a cadre of second-wave wannabe types to replicate slating this year, but that unsurprisingly came to naught.

In its stead are excellent stories and people, all of which and whom got on to the ballot on the strength of their work. Which is as it should be.

6. If you would like to vote for the Hugo Awards this year, the way to do it is to get a membership in this year’s Worldcon, which takes place in San Jose this August. You can get an attending membership (which means you get to all the panels and events, including the Hugo ceremony), or a supporting membership, which allows you to vote for the Hugos. For the past several years, the Worldcons have had “reading packets” which have included many of the nominated works; it’s likely this will happen again this year, which makes a membership an additional value. Again, here’s the link to this year’s Worldcon site to find out more.

7. Also, yes, I will be attending Worldcon this year. We’ve been trying to finagle having me DJ an 80s dance there — if being a finalist for the Best Novel Hugo this year does anything for me, it probably makes me hosting a dance more likely. That’ll be a ton of fun, I promise. Hope to see you there.

28 thoughts on “Thoughts On This Year’s Hugo Finalist Ballot

  1. It’s a good book, man. I’ve been reading a lot of your work these last few months, and I recognize this story and these characters as some of the best you’ve done.

    You’re writing an epic, for fucks sake. This book is like the first half of Dune. You’ve created a rich world that made your readers care about the people within it.

    I’ll go out on a limb and say that I think your best challenge will be to follow up The Collapsing Empire with something that is good enough.

    I’m sorry if I am being rude.

  2. Congratulations! There were several novels I really wanted to see on the ballot that didn’t make it, but as you say this has been a terrific year for sf&f, including some debut novels that blew me away. As a reader, competition like this is a joy to see.

  3. Congratulations on making the final Hugo ballot, and congratulations to all the other finalists out there! Looks like my Hugo reading is going to be fun, even if actually having to choose will be difficult.

  4. Congrats, John! I loved Collapsing Empire, and I’m looking forward to the next book in the series. I am also super happy for Mur Lafferty that Six Wakes got nominated, as I really, really enjoyed that book, too! Now to add the other nominees to my read list…

  5. Congratulations. I’ve actually read a couple of the books this year (both good ones).

    Good luck.

  6. Congratulations on your nomination, and you’re right. It’s a formidably good list, right the way down, so voting will be tough.

  7. Unusually for me, I’ve read four of the six nominees so far. As you say, it’s a strong group.

  8. Congratulations! Tastes vary, but I agree, that’s a strong ballot all the way down. Heck, I nominated two of the Best Novel finalists and almost nominated a third. That’s unusual for me, but it makes me happy to see that, as does seeing all the stuff I didn’t nominate but have heard of – and the stuff I haven’t heard of! :-)

  9. On point 2:
    It always disappoints me when competitors degrade their competition. It seems to be very common in sports but the ugly chest thumping goes on anytime there is a competition. If you are not up against the best what have you really won? You want to beat the beast to prove you are the best. There is no shame in losing to the best but there is shame (or at least there should be) in winning if you cannot respect your competition.

    So, congrats on the nomination but more so on your attitude.

  10. I’ve seen you mention “slating” before, though I think this is the first time you’ve called it that. Your explanations have been incomplete and although I know you weren’t happy with it, I am still unsure what people were doing that angered you. Can you direct me to a link or earlier blog of yours which will explain “slating” to me? I’ve read the Wikipedia definition but still unsure how that applies to Hugo nominations.

  11. I’m so thrilled for you, John! It’s delightful to see you honoured among peers you respect and admire, and I hope you have a wonderful time with your buddies at Worldcon!

  12. Ron Beilke:

    It’s all here on the site, you can look it up if you like. There’s a search function. I think I’ve been pretty clear what I thought about it and don’t need to go over it again.

Comments are closed.